Original Contribution: Stacked generalization

Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins.

Publisher Summary This chapter investigates the anatomy and taxonomy of protein structures. A protein is a polypeptide chain made up of amino acid residues linked together in a definite sequence. Amino acids are “handed,” and naturally occurring proteins contain only L-amino acids. A simple mnemonic for that purpose is the “corncrib.” The sequence of side chains determines all that is unique about a particular protein, including its biological function and its specific three-dimensional structure. The major possible routes to knowledge of three-dimensional protein structure are prediction from the amino acid sequence and analysis of spectroscopic measurements such as circular dichroism, laser Raman spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance. The analysis and discussion of protein structure is based on the results of three-dimensional X-ray crystallography of globular proteins. The basic elements of protein structures are discussed. The most useful level at which protein structures are to be categorized is the domain, as there are many cases of multiple-domain proteins in which each separate domain resembles other entire smaller proteins. The simplest type of stable protein structure consists of polypeptide backbone wrapped more or less uniformly around the outside of a single hydrophobic core. The outline of the taxonomy is also provided in the chapter.

The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure.

Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence.

Mitochondrial structure and distribution are regulated by division and fusion events. Mitochondrial division is regulated by Dnm1/Drp1, a dynamin-related protein that forms helices around mitochondria to mediate fission. Little is known about what determines sites of mitochondrial fission within the mitochondrial network. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria exhibit tightly coupled dynamics and have extensive contacts. We tested whether ER plays a role in mitochondrial division. We found that mitochondrial division occurred at positions where ER tubules contacted mitochondria and mediated constriction before Drp1 recruitment. Thus, ER tubules may play an active role in defining the position of mitochondrial division sites.

/pdf/er-tubules-mark-sites-of-mitochondrial-division-502a8m340x.pdf

ER Tubules Mark Sites of Mitochondrial Division

Mitochondria are one of the major ancient endomembrane systems in eukaryotic cells. Owing to their ability to produce ATP through respiration, they became a driving force in evolution. As an essential step in the process of eukaryotic evolution, the size of the mitochondrial chromosome was drastically reduced, and the behaviour of mitochondria within eukaryotic cells radically changed. Recent advances have revealed how the organelle's behaviour has evolved to allow the accurate transmission of its genome and to become responsive to the needs of the cell and its own dysfunction.

/pdf/mitochondrial-form-and-function-1x51ier51r.pdf

Mitochondrial form and function

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) network is extremely dynamic in animal cells, yet little is known about the mechanism and function of its movements. The most common ER dynamic, termed ER sliding, involves ER tubule extension along stable microtubules (MTs). In this study, we show that ER sliding occurs on nocodazole-resistant MTs that are posttranslationally modified by acetylation. We demonstrate that high MT curvature is a good indicator of MT acetylation and show in live cells that ER sliding occurs predominantly on these curved, acetylated MTs. Furthermore, increasing MT acetylation by drug treatment increases the frequency of ER sliding. One purpose of the ER sliding on modified MT tracts could be to regulate its interorganelle contacts. We find that all mitochondria and many endosomes maintain contact with the ER despite the movements of each. However, mitochondria, but not endosomes, preferentially localize to acetylated MTs. Thus, different ER dynamics may occur on distinct MT populations to establish or maintain contacts with different organelles.

https://rupress.org/jcb/article-pdf/190/3/363/1347209/jcb_200911024.pdf

ER sliding dynamics and ER–mitochondrial contacts occur on acetylated microtubules

Autophagy is a central homeostasis and stress response pathway conserved in all eukaryotes One hallmark of autophagy is the de novo formation of autophagosomes These double-membrane vesicular structures form around and deliver cargo for degradation by the vacuole/lysosome Where and how autophagosomes form are outstanding questions Here we show, using proteomic, cytological, and functional analyses, that autophagosomes are spatially, physically, and functionally linked to endoplasmic reticulum exit sites (ERES), which are specialized regions of the endoplasmic reticulum where COPII transport vesicles are generated Our data demonstrate that ERES are core autophagosomal biogenesis components whose function is required for the hierarchical assembly of the autophagy machinery immediately downstream of the Atg1 kinase complex at phagophore assembly sites

ER exit sites are physical and functional core autophagosome biogenesis components

http://mcb5068.wustl.edu/MCB/Lecturers/Hanson/Reviews/Part1/ER_morphology.pdf

Jonathan R. Friedman

Papers

ER Tubules Mark Sites of Mitochondrial Division

Mitochondrial form and function

ER sliding dynamics and ER–mitochondrial contacts occur on acetylated microtubules

ER exit sites are physical and functional core autophagosome biogenesis components

The ER in 3D: a multifunctional dynamic membrane network