scispace - formally typeset
J

Judith Glück

Researcher at Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt

Publications -  79
Citations -  3225

Judith Glück is an academic researcher from Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. The author has contributed to research in topics: Spatial ability & Rasch model. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 76 publications receiving 2712 citations. Previous affiliations of Judith Glück include Adria Airways & Max Planck Society.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychological Wisdom Research: Commonalities and Differences in a Growing Field

TL;DR: The growth and scope of psychological wisdom research over the past few decades demonstrate that it is possible to investigate this complex construct with empirical rigor.
Journal ArticleDOI

Making Things Better and Learning a Lesson: Experiencing Wisdom Across the Lifespan

TL;DR: Unlike adolescents, older and, especially, young adults report having learned lessons about themselves or having gained a life philosophy from the wisdom-related event, which highlights both similarities and differences in the life span manifestation of experienced wisdom.
Journal ArticleDOI

Odor Identification, Consistency of Label Use, Olfactory Threshold and their Relationships to Odor Memory over the Human Lifespan

TL;DR: It is concluded that children possess equal olfactory sensitivity compared with adults; however, due to limitations in linguistic capabilities and familiarity to odorants, odor memory and odor identification performance was limited.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools

TL;DR: This paper first reviews studies that used VR technologies to study different aspects of spatial ability and results and findings will be presented from one of the first large-scale studies that investigated the potential of an AR application to train spatial ability.
Journal ArticleDOI

How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures.

TL;DR: This study compares four well-established measures of wisdom with respect to content, reliability, factorial structure, and construct validity (relationships to wisdom nomination, interview-based wisdom ratings, and correlates of wisdom) and recommends the most suitable measure for researchers to select for their substantive interests.