This paper contains ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for average horizontal-component ground motions as a function of earthquake magnitude, distance from source to site, local average shear-wave velocity, and fault type. Our equations are for peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), and 5%-damped pseudo-absolute-acceleration spectra (PSA) at periods between 0.01 s and 10 s. They were derived by empirical regression of an extensive strong-motion database compiled by the “PEER NGA” (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center’s Next Generation Attenuation) project. For periods less than 1s , the analysis used 1,574 records from 58 mainshocks in the distance range from 0 km to 400 km (the number of available data decreased as period increased). The primary predictor variables are moment magnitude M, closest horizontal distance to the surface projection of the fault plane R JB , and the time-averaged shear-wave velocity from the surface to 30 m VS30. The equations are applicable for M =5–8 , RJB 200 km, and VS30= 180– 1300 m / s. DOI: 10.1193/1.2830434

/pdf/ground-motion-prediction-equations-for-the-average-1pxmyzur8d.pdf

Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s

We present a new empirical ground motion model for PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01– 10 s. The model was developed as part of the PEER Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) project. We used a subset of the PEER NGA database for which we excluded recordings and earthquakes that were believed to be inappropriate for estimating free-field ground motions from shallow earthquake mainshocks in active tectonic regimes. We developed relations for both the median and standard deviation of the geometric mean horizontal component of ground motion that we consider to be valid for magnitudes ranging from 4.0 up to 7.5–8.5 (depending on fault mechanism) and distances ranging from 0 – 200 km. The model explicitly includes the effects of magnitude saturation, magnitude-dependent attenuation, style of faulting, rupture depth, hanging-wall geometry, linear and nonlinear site response, 3-D basin response, and inter-event and intra-event variability. Soil nonlinearity causes the intra-event standard deviation to depend on the amplitude of PGA on reference rock rather than on magnitude, which leads to a decrease in aleatory uncertainty at high levels of ground shaking for sites located on soil. DOI: 10.1193/1.2857546

/pdf/nga-ground-motion-model-for-the-geometric-mean-horizontal-1yqfspz2c2.pdf

NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s

The true performance of ground-motion prediction equations is often not fully appreciated until they are used in practice for seismic hazard analyses and applied to a wide range of scenarios and exceedance levels. This has been the case for equations published recently for the prediction of peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA), and response spectral ordinates in Europe, the Middle East, and the Mediterranean (Akkar and Bommer 2007a,b). This paper presents an update that corrects the shortcomings identified in those equations, which are primarily, but not exclusively, related to the model for the ground-motion variability.

Strong-motion recording networks in Europe and the Middle East were first installed much later than in the United States and Japan but have grown considerably over the last four decades. The databanks of strong-motion data have grown in parallel with the accelerograph networks, and in addition to national collections there have been concerted efforts over more than two decades to develop and maintain a European database of associated metadata ( e.g. , Ambraseys et al. 2004).

As the database of strong-motion records from Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East has expanded, there have been two distinct trends in terms of developing empirical ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs): equations derived from a large dataset covering several countries, generally of moderate-to-high seismicity; and equations derived from local databanks for application within national borders. We refer to the former as pan-European models, noting that this is for expedience since the equations are really derived for southern Europe, the Maghreb (North Africa), and the active areas of the Middle East. The history of the development of both pan-European and national equations is discussed by Bommer et al. (2010), who also review studies that consider the arguments for and against the existence of consistent regional …

Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East

Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings

In code-based seismic design and assessment it is often allowed the use of real records as an input for nonlinear dynamic analysis. On the other hand, international seismic guidelines, concerning this issue, have been found hardly applicable by practitioners. This is related to both the difficulty in rationally relating the ground motions to the hazard at the site and the required selection criteria, which do not favor the use of real records, but rather various types of spectrum matching signals. To overcome some of these obstacles a software tool for code-based real records selection was developed. REXEL, freely available at the website of the Italian network of earthquake engineering university labs (http://www.reluis.it/index_eng.html), allows to search for suites of waveforms, currently from the European Strong-motion Database, compatible to reference spectra being either user-defined or automatically generated according to Eurocode 8 and the recently released new Italian seismic code. The selection reflects the provisions of the considered codes and others found to be important by recent research on the topic. In the paper, record selection criteria are briefly reviewed first, and then the algorithms implemented in the software are discussed. Finally, via some examples, it is shown how REXEL can effectively be a contribution to code-based real records selection for seismic structural analysis.

/pdf/rexel-computer-aided-record-selection-for-code-based-seismic-1u1l0tkvjj.pdf

REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis

Analytical and empirical models for predicting the drift capacity of modern unreinforced masonry walls

Modern unreinforced masonry buildings with reinforced concrete slabs are often retrofitted by inserting reinforced concrete walls. The main advantages of this technique are the increase in strength and displacement capacity with respect to masonry structures. This article presents two modeling approaches for evaluating such structures: a shell-element model and a macro-element one. The objective is to formulate practical recommendations for setting up a macro-element model using as input the geometry of the structure and results from standard material tests. Structural configurations of masonry buildings, in which the insertion of reinforced concrete walls is an efficient retrofit technique, are also investigated.

/pdf/modeling-the-seismic-response-of-modern-urm-buildings-311ec26ldt.pdf

Modeling the Seismic Response of Modern URM Buildings Retrofitted by Adding RC Walls

Reinforced concrete coupled walls are a common lateral load resisting system used in multi-storey buildings. The effect of the coupling beams can improve seismic performance, but at the same time adds complexity to the design procedure. A case study coupled wall building is designed using Force-Based Design (FBD) and Direct Displacement-Based Design (DDBD) and in the case of the latter a step by step design example is provided. Distributed plasticity fibre-section beam element numerical models of the coupled walls are developed in which coupling beams are represented by diagonal truss elements and experimental results are used to confirm that this approach can provide a good representation of hysteretic behaviour. The accuracy of the two different design methods is then assessed by comparing the design predictions to the results of non-linear time-history analyses. It is shown that the DDBD approach gives an accurate prediction of inter-storey drift response. The FBD approach, in accordance with NZS1170.5 and NZS3101, is shown to include an impractical procedure for the assignment of coupling beam strengths and code equations for the calculation of coupling beam characteristics appear to include errors. Finally, the work highlights differences between the P-delta considerations that are made in FBD and DDBD, and shows that the code results are very sensitive to the way in which P-delta effects are accounted for.

/pdf/comparison-of-force-based-and-displacement-based-design-2psuu14a6l.pdf

Comparison of force-based and displacement-based design approaches for RC coupled walls in New Zealand

Shear-compression tests of URM walls: Various setups and their influence on experimental results

https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/242211/Minerva_sub.pdf

Katrin Beyer

Papers

Analytical and empirical models for predicting the drift capacity of modern unreinforced masonry walls

Modeling the Seismic Response of Modern URM Buildings Retrofitted by Adding RC Walls

Comparison of force-based and displacement-based design approaches for RC coupled walls in New Zealand

Shear-compression tests of URM walls: Various setups and their influence on experimental results

Seismic performance of slender RC U-shaped walls with a single-layer of reinforcement