The National High Blood Pressure Education Program presents the complete Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Like its predecessors, the purpose is to provide an evidence-based approach to the prevention and management of hypertension. The key messages of this report are these: in those older than age 50, systolic blood pressure (BP) of greater than 140 mm Hg is a more important cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor than diastolic BP; beginning at 115/75 mm Hg, CVD risk doubles for each increment of 20/10 mm Hg; those who are normotensive at 55 years of age will have a 90% lifetime risk of developing hypertension; prehypertensive individuals (systolic BP 120-139 mm Hg or diastolic BP 80-89 mm Hg) require health-promoting lifestyle modifications to prevent the progressive rise in blood pressure and CVD; for uncomplicated hypertension, thiazide diuretic should be used in drug treatment for most, either alone or combined with drugs from other classes; this report delineates specific high-risk conditions that are compelling indications for the use of other antihypertensive drug classes (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers); two or more antihypertensive medications will be required to achieve goal BP (<140/90 mm Hg, or <130/80 mm Hg) for patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease; for patients whose BP is more than 20 mm Hg above the systolic BP goal or more than 10 mm Hg above the diastolic BP goal, initiation of therapy using two agents, one of which usually will be a thiazide diuretic, should be considered; regardless of therapy or care, hypertension will be controlled only if patients are motivated to stay on their treatment plan. Positive experiences, trust in the clinician, and empathy improve patient motivation and satisfaction. This report serves as a guide, and the committee continues to recognize that the responsible physician's judgment remains paramount.

Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure

The rapid technological developments of the past decade and the changes in echocardiographic practice brought about by these developments have resulted in the need for updated recommendations to the previously published guidelines for cardiac chamber quantification, which was the goal of the joint writing group assembled by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. This document provides updated normal values for all four cardiac chambers, including three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial deformation, when possible, on the basis of considerably larger numbers of normal subjects, compiled from multiple databases. In addition, this document attempts to eliminate several minor discrepancies that existed between previously published guidelines.

https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5953422/file/5953443.pdf

Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

https://caltcm.memberclicks.net/assets/documents/acc_aha_chf_2013_guidelines.pdf

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

PREAMBLE......e4

APPENDIX 1......e121

APPENDIX 2......e122

APPENDIX 3......e124

REFERENCES......e124

It is important that the medical profession play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies as they are introduced in the detection, management,

/pdf/acc-aha-2006-guidelines-for-the-management-of-patients-with-27qfh9fc7i.pdf

ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease

Although considerable improvement has occurred in the process of care for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), room for improvement exists.[1–3][1][][2][][3] The purpose of the present guideline is to focus on the numerous advances in the diagnosis and management of patients

/pdf/acc-aha-guidelines-for-the-management-of-patients-with-st-3d4n2zt04k.pdf

ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)

Commentary on: London MJ, Hur K, Schwartz GG, et al. Association of perioperative β-blockade with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity following major noncardiac surgery. JAMA 2013;309:1704–13.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4]

There has been recent controversy in the perioperative community amid allegations of scientific misconduct and there remains uncertainty about the effectiveness and safety of perioperative β-blockade in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.1 Current American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation (AHA/ACCF) Guidelines on perioperative evaluation and care for non-cardiac surgery limit a class I practice recommendation to the continuation of pre-existing β-blockade.2

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a population-based sample of 136 745 patients who were 1:1 matched on propensity scores treated at 104 veterans affairs (VA) medical centres (96.3% men in full cohort). Perioperative risk, process and outcome data from patients undergoing non-cardiac surgical procedures …

 [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJAMA%26rft.volume%253D309%26rft.spage%253D1704%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1001%252Fjama.2013.4135%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F23613075%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx
 [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2013.4135&link_type=DOI
 [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=23613075&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmed%2F19%2F1%2F26.atom
 [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000317906700027&link_type=ISI

https://ebm.bmj.com/content/ebmed/early/2013/07/12/eb-2013-101408.full.pdf

Perioperative β-blockade improves outcomes in higher risk patients following non-cardiac surgery

Prior Coronary Revascularization and Risk of Noncardiac Surgery.

Diagnostik und Management der Aortendissektion - Orientierung zwischen Empfehlungen und Registerdaten (Antwortbogen)

Source Citation Kavousi M, Leening MJ, Nanchen D, et al. Comparison of application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for...

Kim A. Eagle

Papers

Perioperative β-blockade improves outcomes in higher risk patients following non-cardiac surgery

Prior Coronary Revascularization and Risk of Noncardiac Surgery.

Diagnostik und Management der Aortendissektion - Orientierung zwischen Empfehlungen und Registerdaten (Antwortbogen)

ACC/AHA, Adult Treatment Panel III, and ESC guidelines overestimated risk for CVD in older adults

Low body mass index is an important correlate of fatal and nonfatal complications after percutaneous coronary interventions