K
Kristin Anacker
Researcher at Dresden University of Technology
Publications - 5
Citations - 107
Kristin Anacker is an academic researcher from Dresden University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Need for cognition & Dopaminergic. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 5 publications receiving 101 citations. Previous affiliations of Kristin Anacker include Chemnitz University of Technology.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
No association between dopamine D4 receptor gene exon III and -521C/T polymorphism and novelty seeking.
Alexander Strobel,K.P. Lesch,K. Hohenberger,Susanne Jatzke,H O Gutzeit,Kristin Anacker,Burkhard Brocke +6 more
TL;DR: No association between dopamine D4 receptor gene exon III and –521C/T polymorphism and Novelty Seeking is found.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dopamine D4 receptor exon III genotype influence on the auditory evoked novelty P3
Alexander Strobel,Stefan Debener,Kristin Anacker,Johannes Müller,Klaus-Peter Lesch,Burkhard Brocke +5 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that the DRD4 exon III polymorphism influences the processing of novelty and that this influence depends on tonic dopaminergic activity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dopamine D4 receptor gene variation impacts self-reported altruism.
TL;DR: A conceptual replication of the association between DRD4 VNTR and altruism measured with the well-established Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) is reported.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cognitive Engagement Mediates the Relationship between Positive Life Events and Positive Emotionality.
TL;DR: The present results lend support to the notion of NFC as an important factor supporting personal well-being by way of its mediating role between the number of past positive life events and positive affect.
Journal ArticleDOI
Intellectual Investment, Dopaminergic Gene Variation, and Life Events: A Critical Examination.
Alexander Strobel,Anja Strobel,Sören Enge,Monika Fleischhauer,Andreas Reif,Klaus-Peter Lesch,Klaus-Peter Lesch,Klaus-Peter Lesch,Kristin Anacker +8 more
TL;DR: The findings underscore the importance to use different approaches in the field of personality neuroscience to gain deeper insight into the basis of personality traits and requires more differentiated statistical analyses that can at least in part tackle the often inconsistent findings in this field.