scispace - formally typeset
L

Lennart E. Nacke

Researcher at University of Waterloo

Publications -  228
Citations -  16483

Lennart E. Nacke is an academic researcher from University of Waterloo. The author has contributed to research in topics: Game design & Game mechanics. The author has an hindex of 44, co-authored 207 publications receiving 13729 citations. Previous affiliations of Lennart E. Nacke include University of Saskatchewan & Information Technology University.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

The Development of "Orbit": The Collaborative BCI Game for Children with AD(H)D

TL;DR: It was found that collaborative multiplayer games are suitable from a therapeutic standpoint and long-term use because of its higher social motivation and collaboration between children with AD(H)D; albeit there are some drawbacks including unreliability of electroencephalography (EEG) input and the risk for the collaborative environment to be distracting for the player.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

“I Don’t Want To Shoot The Android”: Players Translate Real-Life Moral Intuitions to In-Game Decisions in Detroit: Become Human

TL;DR: In this article , the authors analyzed how participants applied their real-life morals toward in-game decisions using thematic analysis and statistical analysis of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ30) results.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

'Imi Pono: Creating an Ethical Framework for User Experience Design

TL;DR: This workshop is designed to establish a foundation of understanding of ethical practice for designers, educators, developers, programmers, and individuals working in UX.

Analysing Social Metrics in an Online Game Site

TL;DR: It is argued for using social accounting metrics to investigate large game sites and demonstrate how social accounting techniques can be used to gain a broad understanding of the meta-game activity throughout a game site.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

How to: Peer Review for CHI (and Beyond)

TL;DR: This course will help participants understand the expectations of different submission types, how different venues make decisions, and identifying strong contributions, robust methodologies, and clear writing to create reviews for these different settings.