M
Mark Burnley
Researcher at University of Kent
Publications - 91
Citations - 5307
Mark Burnley is an academic researcher from University of Kent. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Isometric exercise. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 77 publications receiving 4517 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark Burnley include University of Wales & University of Brighton.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Critical Power: Implications for Determination of V˙O2max and Exercise Tolerance
TL;DR: This brief review presents the practical and theoretical foundations for the CP concept, explores rigorous alternative mathematical approaches, and highlights exciting new evidence regarding its mechanistic bases and its broad applicability to human athletic performance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Oxygen uptake kinetics as a determinant of sports performance
Mark Burnley,Andrew M. Jones +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the basis for these relationships by explaining the influence of these “traditional” variables on the dynamic profiles of the response to exercise of different intensities, and how these differences in dynamics are related to exercise tolerance and fatigue.
Journal ArticleDOI
Critical Power: An Important Fatigue Threshold in Exercise Physiology.
TL;DR: The CP concept enables important insights into 1) the principal loci of fatigue development at different intensities of exercise and 2) mechanisms of cardiovascular and metabolic control and their modulation by factors such as O2 delivery.
Journal ArticleDOI
Determination of critical power using a 3-min all-out cycling test.
TL;DR: During a 3-min all-out cycling test, power output declined to a stable value in approximately the last 45 s, and this power output was not significantly different from the independently measured critical power.
Journal ArticleDOI
Oxygen uptake kinetics in treadmill running and cycle ergometry: a comparison
Helen Carter,Andrew M. Jones,Thomas J. Barstow,Mark Burnley,Craig A. Williams,Jonathan H. Doust +5 more
TL;DR: The differences between the modes are related to the higher intramuscular tension development in heavy cycle exercise and the higher eccentric exercise component in running, which may cause a relatively greater recruitment of the less efficient type II muscle fibers in cycling.