scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Mark Trinder published in 2023"



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors estimate how much information conveyed by self reported family history of heart disease (FHHD) is already explained by clinical and genetic risk factors (polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease [PRSCAD], heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia [HeFH], and HeFH (OR 1.54) were most strongly associated with FHHD.
Abstract: AIM To estimate how much information conveyed by self reported family history of heart disease (FHHD) is already explained by clinical and genetic risk factors. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of UK Biobank participants without preexisting coronary artery disease using a multivariable model with self-reported FHHD as the outcome. Clinical (diabetes, hypertension, smoking, apolipoprotein B-to-apolipoprotein AI ratio, waist-to-hip ratio, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein(a), triglycerides) and genetic risk factors (polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease [PRSCAD], heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia [HeFH]) were exposures. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and cholesterol-lowering medication use. Multiple logistic regression models were fitted to associate FHHD with risk factors, with continuous variables treated as quintiles. Population attributable risks (PAR) were subsequently calculated from the resultant odds ratios. RESULTS Among 166,714 individuals, 72,052 (43.2%) participants reported a FHHD. In a multivariable model, genetic risk factors PRSCAD (OR 1.30, CI 1.27-1.33), and HeFH (OR 1.31, 1.11-1.54) were most strongly associated with FHHD. Clinical risk factors followed: hypertension (OR 1.18, CI 1.15-1.21), Lp(a) (OR 1.17, CI 1.14-1.20), apolipoprotein B-to-apolipoprotein AI ratio, (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10-1.16) and triglycerides (OR 1.07, CI 1.04-1.10). For the PAR analyses: 21.9% (CI 18.19-25.63) of the risk of reporting a FHHD is attributed to clinical factors, 22.2% (CI% 20.44-23.88) is attributed to genetic factors, and 36.0% (CI 33.31-38.68) is attributed to genetic and clinical factors combined. CONCLUSIONS A combined model of clinical and genetic risk factors explains only 36% of the likelihood of FHHD, implying additional value in the family history.

1 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a prospective follow-up study used data from 5 independent heterozygous FH cohorts from Europe and North America to study the association between the presence of MetS and the incidence of different ASCVD endpoints and all-cause mortality.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors performed targeted next-generation sequencing of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) genes, followed by long-read sequencing of LDLR gene in patients with > 1 pathogenic LDLR variant.
Abstract: Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by extremely elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and accelerated atherosclerosis. Accurate identification of patients with HoFH is essential as they may be eligible for specialized treatments. We hypothesized that a subset of patients with clinically diagnosed heterozygous FH (HeFH) may in fact have HoFH, and this could be identified by genetic diagnosis. Methods: We recruited patients with a clinical diagnosis of HeFH based on a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥6 and no secondary cause of hypercholesterolemia. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), and low-density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 (LDLRAP1) genes, followed by long-read sequencing of the LDLR gene in patients with >1 pathogenic LDLR variant. We examined lipid levels and cardiovascular events. Results: Among 705 patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH, we identified a single pathogenic variant in 300 (42.6%) and >1 pathogenic variant in the LDLR gene in 11 patients (1.6%). We established a genetic diagnosis of HoFH in 6 (0.9%) patients (3 true homozygotes and 3 compound heterozygotes). The mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and prevalence of premature cardiovascular disease of patients with genetically identified HoFH was significantly higher than patients with HeFH. Conclusions: In a cohort of patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH, genetic testing including long-read sequencing revealed that 0.9% had HoFH. These patients tended to have a more severe clinical phenotype. Genetic testing of patients with clinical FH may identify patients with HoFH that had eluded clinical diagnosis.