scispace - formally typeset
M

Mary K. Goldstein

Researcher at Stanford University

Publications -  167
Citations -  6818

Mary K. Goldstein is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Decision support system & Health care. The author has an hindex of 44, co-authored 162 publications receiving 6202 citations. Previous affiliations of Mary K. Goldstein include VA Palo Alto Healthcare System & St. Michael's GAA, Sligo.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Health Outcomes Associated with Polypharmacy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review

TL;DR: Evidence regarding the health outcomes associated with polypharmacy, defined as number of prescribed medications, in older community‐dwelling persons, is summarized.
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening for frailty: criteria and predictors of outcomes.

TL;DR: To determine the reliability of rapid screening by clinically derived geriatric criteria in predicting outcomes of elderly hospitalized patients, a large number of patients have been admitted to hospital and the standard of care has changed significantly over time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Interventions that included team change as a QI strategy were associated with the largest reductions in blood pressure outcomes and a focus on hypertension by someone in addition to the patient's physician was associated with substantial improvement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Racial differences in blood pressure control: potential explanatory factors

TL;DR: In this sample of hypertensive patients who have good access to health care and medication benefits, African Americans continued to have lower levels of blood pressure control despite considering more than 20 factors related toBlood pressure control.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ethical Decision Making and Patient Autonomy: A Comparison of Physicians and Patients in Japan and the United States

TL;DR: Family and physician opinions are accorded a larger role in clinical decision making by the Japanese physicians and patients sampled than by those in the United States, although both cultures place a greater emphasis on patient preferences than on the preferences of the family or physician.