scispace - formally typeset
M

Matthew P. Fox

Researcher at Boston University

Publications -  337
Citations -  14658

Matthew P. Fox is an academic researcher from Boston University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 57, co-authored 300 publications receiving 12378 citations. Previous affiliations of Matthew P. Fox include University of Minnesota & University of the Witwatersrand.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cohort profile: the South African National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) National HIV Cohort

TL;DR: The creation of NHLS National HIV Cohort has enabled longitudinal research on all lab-monitored patients in South Africa’s national HIV programme, including analyses of patient health at presentation, care outcomes such as ‘CD4 recovery’, ‘retention in care’ and ‘viral resuppression’.
Book ChapterDOI

Data Sources for Bias Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, bias analyses modify a conventional estimate of association to account for bias introduced by systematic error, which ultimately determines the direction and magnitude of the adjustment, and the sensitivity and specificity of exposure classification, within subgroups of persons with and without the disease outcome of interest.
Journal ArticleDOI

Flexibly Accounting for Exposure Misclassification With External Validation Data

TL;DR: A reparameterized imputation approach for measurement error (RIME) that can be used with internal or external validation data and which outperformed MIME when validation data included only true and mismeasured versions of the exposure or when exposure prevalence differed between the data sources.
Journal ArticleDOI

Antibiotic trials for community-acquired pneumonia

TL;DR: It is disappointing that the authors, while criticising the neonatal sepsis studies that assessed treatment that could be given in clinics or outpatient settings for babies who cannot access in-patient care, do not suggest any alternatives for these babies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Will Podcasting and Social Media Replace Journals and Traditional Science Communication? No, but...

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on Twitter and podcasting and discuss their relevance to epidemiology and science communication, and highlight three key reasons why epidemiologists should be engaging with these mediums: 1) science communications, 2) career advancement, and 3) development of a community and public service.