http://www.cell.com/article/S109727652101025X/pdf

Distal and proximal cis-regulatory elements sense X chromosome dosage and developmental state at the Xist locus

Early in development, placental and marsupial mammals harbouring at least two X chromosomes per nucleus are faced with a choice that affects the rest of their lives: which of those X chromosomes to transcriptionally inactivate. This choice underlies phenotypical diversity in the composition of tissues and organs and in their response to the environment, and can determine whether an individual will be healthy or affected by an X-linked disease. Here, we review our current understanding of the process of choice during X-chromosome inactivation and its implications, focusing on the strategies evolved by different mammalian lineages and on the known and unknown molecular mechanisms and players involved.

/pdf/mechanisms-of-choice-in-x-chromosome-inactivation-1uzx82eo.pdf

Mechanisms of Choice in X-Chromosome Inactivation

Transposable elements in plants: Recent advancements, tools and prospects

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) belong to a class of non-protein-coding RNAs with their lengths longer than 200 nucleotides. Most of the mammalian genome is transcribed as RNA, yet only a small percent of the transcribed RNA corresponds to exons of protein-coding genes. Thus, the number of lncRNAs is predicted to be several times higher than that of protein-coding genes. Because of sheer number of lncRNAs, it is often difficult to elucidate the functions of all lncRNAs, especially those arising from their relationship to their binding partners, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins. Due to their binding to other macromolecules, it has become evident that the structures of lncRNAs influence their functions. In this regard, the recent development of epitranscriptomics (the field of study to investigate RNA modifications) has become important to further elucidate the structures and functions of lncRNAs. In this review, the current status of lncRNA structures and functions influenced by epitranscriptomic marks is discussed.

/pdf/current-status-of-epitranscriptomic-marks-affecting-lncrna-e9s00xs5.pdf

Current Status of Epitranscriptomic Marks Affecting lncRNA Structures and Functions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102353

Chromosomal and environmental contributions to sex differences in the vulnerability to neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders: Implications for therapeutic interventions

Genomic repeats have been intensely studied as regulatory elements controlling gene transcription, splicing and genome architecture. Our understanding of the role of the repetitive RNA such as the RNA coming from genomic repeats, or repetitive sequences embedded in mRNA/lncRNAs, in nuclear and cellular functions is instead still limited. In this review we discuss evidence supporting the multifaceted roles of repetitive RNA and RNA binding proteins in nuclear organization, gene regulation, and in the formation of dynamic membrane-less aggregates. We hope that our review will further stimulate research in the consolidating field of repetitive RNA biology.

/pdf/emerging-roles-of-repetitive-and-repeat-containing-rna-in-20agzwphuq.pdf

Emerging Roles of Repetitive and Repeat-Containing RNA in Nuclear and Chromatin Organization and Gene Expression.

The onset of random X chromosome inactivation in mouse requires the switch from a symmetric to an asymmetric state, where the identities of the future inactive and active X chromosomes are assigned. This process is known as X chromosome choice. Here, we show that RIF1 and KAP1 are two fundamental factors for the definition of this transcriptional asymmetry. We found that at the onset of differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), biallelic up-regulation of the long non-coding RNA Tsix weakens the symmetric association of RIF1 with the Xist promoter. The Xist allele maintaining the association with RIF1 goes on to up-regulate Xist RNA expression in a RIF1-dependent manner. Conversely, the promoter that loses RIF1 gains binding of KAP1, and KAP1 is required for the increase in Tsix levels preceding the choice. We propose that the mutual exclusion of Tsix and RIF1, and of RIF1 and KAP1, at the Xist promoters establish a self-sustaining loop that transforms an initially stochastic event into a stably inherited asymmetric X-chromosome state.

RIF1 and KAP1 differentially regulate the choice of inactive versus active X chromosomes.

Female mammals achieve dosage compensation by inactivating one of their two X chromosomes during development, a process entirely dependent on Xist, an X-linked long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). At the onset of X chromosome inactivation (XCI), Xist is up-regulated and spreads along the future inactive X chromosome. Contextually, it recruits repressive histone and DNA modifiers that transcriptionally silence the X chromosome. Xist regulation is tightly coupled to differentiation and its expression is under the control of both pluripotency and epigenetic factors. Recent evidence has suggested that chromatin remodelers accumulate at the X Inactivation Center (XIC) and here we demonstrate a new role for Chd8 in Xist regulation in differentiating ES cells, linked to its control and prevention of spurious transcription factor interactions occurring within Xist regulatory regions. Our findings have a broader relevance, in the context of complex, developmentally-regulated gene expression.

/pdf/chd8-regulates-x-chromosome-inactivation-in-mouse-through-6p9qdfos7j.pdf

Chd8 regulates X chromosome inactivation in mouse through fine-tuning control of Xist expression.

The onset of random X inactivation in mouse requires the switch from a symmetric to an asymmetric state, where the identities of the future inactive and active X chromosomes are assigned. Here we show that RIF1 and KAP1 are two fundamental factors for the definition of the asymmetry. Our data show that at the onset of mESC differentiation, upregulation of the long non-coding RNA Tsix weakens the symmetric RIF1 association with the Xist promoter, and opens a window of opportunity for a more stable association of KAP1. KAP1 is required to sustain high levels of Tsix, thus reinforcing and propagating the asymmetry, and, as a result, marking the future active X chromosome. Furthermore, we show that RIF1 association with the future inactive X chromosome is essential for Xist upregulation. This double-bookmarking system, based on the mutually exclusive relationships of Tsix and RIF1, and RIF1 and KAP1, thus coordinates the identification of the inactive and active X chromosomes and initiates a self-sustaining loop that transforms an initially stochastic event into a stably inherited asymmetric X chromosome state.

/pdf/a-rif1-kap1-based-toggle-switch-stabilises-the-identities-of-4iwqwb7qq9.pdf

Nerea Blanes Ruiz

Papers

Emerging Roles of Repetitive and Repeat-Containing RNA in Nuclear and Chromatin Organization and Gene Expression.

RIF1 and KAP1 differentially regulate the choice of inactive versus active X chromosomes.

Chd8 regulates X chromosome inactivation in mouse through fine-tuning control of Xist expression.

A RIF1/KAP1-based toggle switch stabilises the identities of the inactive and active X chromosomes during X inactivation