One major drawback of the eddy viscosity subgrid‐scale stress models used in large‐eddy simulations is their inability to represent correctly with a single universal constant different turbulent fields in rotating or sheared flows, near solid walls, or in transitional regimes. In the present work a new eddy viscosity model is presented which alleviates many of these drawbacks. The model coefficient is computed dynamically as the calculation progresses rather than input a priori. The model is based on an algebraic identity between the subgrid‐scale stresses at two different filtered levels and the resolved turbulent stresses. The subgrid‐scale stresses obtained using the proposed model vanish in laminar flow and at a solid boundary, and have the correct asymptotic behavior in the near‐wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. The results of large‐eddy simulations of transitional and turbulent channel flow that use the proposed model are in good agreement with the direct simulation data.

A dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy viscosity model

We present an overview of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), a parallel and efficient algorithm for simulating single-phase and multiphase fluid flows and for incorporating additional physical complexities. The LBM is especially useful for modeling complicated boundary conditions and multiphase interfaces. Recent extensions of this method are described, including simulations of fluid turbulence, suspension flows, and reaction diffusion systems.

Lattice boltzmann method for fluid flows

Considerable confusion surrounds the longstanding question of what constitutes a vortex, especially in a turbulent flow. This question, frequently misunderstood as academic, has recently acquired particular significance since coherent structures (CS) in turbulent flows are now commonly regarded as vortices. An objective definition of a vortex should permit the use of vortex dynamics concepts to educe CS, to explain formation and evolutionary dynamics of CS, to explore the role of CS in turbulence phenomena, and to develop viable turbulence models and control strategies for turbulence phenomena. We propose a definition of a vortex in an incompressible flow in terms of the eigenvalues of the symmetric tensor ${\bm {\cal S}}^2 + {\bm \Omega}^2$ are respectively the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the velocity gradient tensor ${\bm \Delta}{\bm u}$. This definition captures the pressure minimum in a plane perpendicular to the vortex axis at high Reynolds numbers, and also accurately defines vortex cores at low Reynolds numbers, unlike a pressure-minimum criterion. We compare our definition with prior schemes/definitions using exact and numerical solutions of the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations for a variety of laminar and turbulent flows. In contrast to definitions based on the positive second invariant of ${\bm \Delta}{\bm u}$ or the complex eigenvalues of ${\bm \Delta}{\bm u}$, our definition accurately identifies the vortex core in flows where the vortex geometry is intuitively clear.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022112095000462

On the identification of a vortex

http://home.eps.hw.ac.uk/~ab226/tmp/implicit/lele_92.pdf

Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution

/pdf/turbulence-and-the-dynamics-of-coherent-structures-i-1o6o6m60fm.pdf

Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures

Study of Tip-Clearance Flow and Stator-Rotor Interaction Using Large-Eddy Simulation

The ability to model turbulence near solid walls and other types of boundaries is important in predicting complex engineering flows. Most turbulence modeling has concentrated either on flows which are nearly homogeneous or isotropic, or on turbulent boundary layers. Boundary layer models usually rely very heavily on the presence of mean shear and the production of turbulence due to that mean shear. Most other turbulence models are based on the assumption of quasi-homogeneity. However, there are many situations of engineering interest which do not involve large shear rates and which are not quasi-homogeneous or isotropic. Shear-free turbulent boundary layers are the prototypical example of such flows, with practical situations being separation and reattachment, bluff body flow, high free-stream turbulence, and free surface flows. Although these situations are not as common as the variants of the flat plate turbulent boundary layer, they tend to be critical factors in complex engineering situations. The models developed are intended to extend classical quasi-homogeneous models into regions of large inhomogeneity. These models do not rely on the presence of mean shear or production, but are still applicable when those additional effects are included. Although the focus is on shear-free boundary layers as tests for these models, results for standard shearing boundary layers are also shown.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19940019670/downloads/19940019670.pdf

New concepts for Reynolds stress transport equation modeling of inhomogeneous flows

A Recommended Modification to the Dynamic Two-Parameter Mixed Subgrid Scale Model

Wall Modeling for Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Boundary Layers

This paper reports on numerical issues in large eddy simulations that have been identified in recent computations of complex flows and theoretical studies. These issues include the effects of inherent numerical dissipation in upwind spatial finitedifference schemes on turbulent power spectra, and the sensitivity of separated and vortex dominated flow solutions to inflow and outflow boundary conditions. We also describe the results from several large eddy simulations of complex turbulent flows, including those performed with a novel numerical technique based on B-splines and a simulation of turbulent flow past an asymmetric trailing-edge with the objective of predicting the far-field noise.

Parviz Moin

Papers

Study of Tip-Clearance Flow and Stator-Rotor Interaction Using Large-Eddy Simulation

New concepts for Reynolds stress transport equation modeling of inhomogeneous flows

A Recommended Modification to the Dynamic Two-Parameter Mixed Subgrid Scale Model

Wall Modeling for Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Boundary Layers

Numerical Issues in Large Eddy Simulation of Complex Turbulent Flows and Application to Aeroacoustics