Paul Scharre

TL;DR: The following organisations are named on the report: Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, Universityof Cambridge, Center for a New American Security, Electronic Frontier Foundation, OpenAI.

TL;DR: This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems and their associated development processes, with a focus on providing evidence about the safety, security, fairness, and privacy protection of AI systems.

TL;DR: This work states that autonomous systems, in their current state, lack the robustness and flexibility of human intelligence and are not appropriate for many tasks, so human-machine teaming to combine the best of each will result in the most capable future force.

TL;DR: It is argued that countries may be more likely to use risky forms of autonomy when they fear that their second-strike capabilities will be undermined, and there should be many applications of more autonomous systems in nuclear operations that can increase reliability, reduce the risk of accidents, and buy more time for decision-makers in a crisis.

TL;DR: Scharre et al. as mentioned in this paper argue that success or failure depends on the desirability (i.e., a weapon's military value versus its perceived horribleness) and feasibility (e.g., sociopolitical factors that influence its success) of arms control.