scispace - formally typeset
T

Thomas Krendl Gilbert

Researcher at University of California, Berkeley

Publications -  27
Citations -  374

Thomas Krendl Gilbert is an academic researcher from University of California, Berkeley. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Sociotechnical system. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 17 publications receiving 152 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas Krendl Gilbert include University of California.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims

TL;DR: This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems and their associated development processes, with a focus on providing evidence about the safety, security, fairness, and privacy protection of AI systems.
Journal ArticleDOI

To explain or not to explain?—Artificial intelligence explainability in clinical decision support systems

TL;DR: Whether explainability can provide added value to CDSS depends on several key questions: technical feasibility, the level of validation in case of explainable algorithms, the characteristics of the context in which the system is implemented, the designated role in the decision-making process, and the key user group(s).
Journal ArticleDOI

Hard choices in artificial intelligence

TL;DR: The vagueness in debates about the safety and ethical behavior of AI systems is examined, and it is shown how it cannot be resolved through mathematical formalism alone, instead requiring deliberation about the politics of development as well as the context of deployment.
Posted Content

A Broader View on Bias in Automated Decision-Making: Reflecting on Epistemology and Dynamics.

TL;DR: This position paper interprets technical bias as an epistemological problem and emergent bias as a dynamical feedback phenomenon and point to value-sensitive design methodologies to revisit the design and implementation process of automated decision-making systems.