scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter Howitt

Researcher at Brown University

Publications -  171
Citations -  29383

Peter Howitt is an academic researcher from Brown University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Endogenous growth theory & Competition (economics). The author has an hindex of 58, co-authored 171 publications receiving 27996 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter Howitt include University of Western Ontario & University of Notre Dame.

Papers
More filters
ReportDOI

A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction

Philippe Aghion, +1 more
- 01 Mar 1992 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, a model of endogenous growth is developed in which vertical innovations, generated by a competitive research sector, constitute the underlying source of growth and equilibrium is determined by a forward-looking difference equation, according to which the amount of research in any period depends upon the expected amount of the research next period.
Posted Content

Endogenous Growth Theory

TL;DR: Aghion and Howitt make use of Schumpeter's concept of creative destruction, the competitive process whereby entrepreneurs constantly seek new ideas that will render their rivals' ideas obsolete as discussed by the authors.
Report SeriesDOI

Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the relationship between product market competition and innovation and find strong evidence of an inverted-U relationship using panel data, where competition discourages laggard firms from innovating but encourages neck-and-neck firms to innovate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the relationship between product market competition and innovation and found a robust inverted-U relationship between competition and patenting, and developed an endogenousm growth model with step-by-step innovation that can deliver this inverted U pattern.
Journal ArticleDOI

Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation

TL;DR: In contrast to earlier Schumpeterian models in which innovations are always made by outsider firms who earn no rents if they fail to innovate and become monopolies if they do innovate, the authors find that the usual Schumpetersian effect of more intense product market competition is almost always outweighed by the increased incentive for firms to innovate in order to escape competition, so that PMC has a positive effect on growth.