scispace - formally typeset
R

Roel Schats

Researcher at VU University Amsterdam

Publications -  104
Citations -  3978

Roel Schats is an academic researcher from VU University Amsterdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pregnancy & Pregnancy rate. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 101 publications receiving 3673 citations. Previous affiliations of Roel Schats include VU University Medical Center & University of Amsterdam.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis

TL;DR: Couples with idiopathic or male subfertility should be counselled that IUI offers the same likelihood of successful pregnancy as IVF, and is a more cost-effective approach.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve.

TL;DR: Anti-Müllerian hormone is comparable with other commonly used ovarian reserve tests but is probably most applicable in general practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection

TL;DR: NIR metabolomic profiling of spent embryo culture media was able to distinguish viable embryos from non-viable embryos for reproduction and produced unique metabolomic profiles that correlated to an embryo's reproductive potential.
Journal ArticleDOI

The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis

TL;DR: Embryo variables appeared to have a significant but modest value in predicting the probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer and other variables, such as the thickness of the endometrium, were found to have no prognostic value.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ovarian volume and antral follicle count for the prediction of low and hyper responders with in vitro fertilization.

TL;DR: AFC performs well as a test for ovarian response being superior or at least similar to complex expensive and time consuming endocrine tests, and is therefore likely to be the test for general practise.