S
Sten Johansson
Researcher at Linköping University
Publications - 151
Citations - 2931
Sten Johansson is an academic researcher from Linköping University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Superalloy & Residual stress. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 151 publications receiving 2456 citations. Previous affiliations of Sten Johansson include Union Institute & University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Energy input effect on morphology and microstructure of selective laser melting single track from metallic powder
TL;DR: In this article, the influence of the energy input parameters (80-900°C preheating temperature and 0.08-0.28m/s laser scanning speed) on microstructure and geometry of single tracks fabricated of stainless steel grade 316L powder was analyzed.
Journal ArticleDOI
The influence of cooling rate and manganese content on the β-Al5FeSi phase formation and mechanical properties of Al–Si-based alloys
TL;DR: In this article, the influence of manganese level and cooling rate on the formation of iron compounds and mechanical properties of Al-9%Si alloys containing 0.3%Fe was investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI
Deformation and damage mechanisms during thermal-mechanical fatigue of a single-crystal superalloy
TL;DR: In this paper, the deformation and damage mechanisms arising during thermal-mechanical fatigue (TMF) of the single-crystal superalloy CMSX-4 have been investigated, both in the virgin condition and after long-term exposure at 1000°C.
Journal ArticleDOI
Micromechanical behavior and texture evolution of duplex stainless steel studied by neutron diffraction and self-consistent modeling
TL;DR: In this article, a visco-plastic self-consistent model was proposed to model the microscopic incompatibility-induced stresses in a duplex stainless steel undergoing plastic deformation.
Book ChapterDOI
Conceptualizing and Measuring Quality of Life for National Policy
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the role of social indicators and social reporting as continuous information on these common concerns in the context of an epistemology of the democratic process and suggest that social reporting would serve the democratic processes best if it answers how it is and leaves the answers on how it ought to be and what should be done to come about through discussion among citizens.