scispace - formally typeset
S

Stephen Sutton

Researcher at University of Cambridge

Publications -  421
Citations -  23035

Stephen Sutton is an academic researcher from University of Cambridge. The author has contributed to research in topics: Randomized controlled trial & Smoking cessation. The author has an hindex of 70, co-authored 412 publications receiving 20781 citations. Previous affiliations of Stephen Sutton include Cooperative Research Centre & James Cook University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening

TL;DR: Compliance rates, yield of adenomas, and referral rate for colonoscopy were as expected, but cancer detection rates were higher, and one person died following surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Context-Sensing Mobile Phone App (Q Sense) for Smoking Cessation: A Mixed-Methods Study

TL;DR: A context-aware smoking cessation app which uses a smoking episode-reporting system combined with location sensing and geofencing to tailor support content and trigger support delivery in real time is developed.
Book

The SAGE Handbook of Health Psychology

TL;DR: This book discusses the role of emotion, self-regulation, and intervention in the development of healthy emotions in the context of health-related illness and its consequences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting uptake of a routine cervical smear test: A comparison of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour

TL;DR: In this paper, the TPB emerged as the superior model for predicting screening intentions, explaining 51% of the variance in comparison with only 4% explained by the HBM variables However, neither model was able to predict a significant amount of variance in uptake of screening three months later.
Journal ArticleDOI

How do patients who participate in cancer support groups differ from those who do not

TL;DR: Investigation of differences between participants of a community cancer support group and a random selection of non‐participants from the Cancer Registry found support group participants held more favourable views of support groups, believed that significant others were favourable towards participation, and perceived less difficulty in joining a group.