scispace - formally typeset
S

Stewart W. Franks

Researcher at University of Tasmania

Publications -  119
Citations -  8250

Stewart W. Franks is an academic researcher from University of Tasmania. The author has contributed to research in topics: Climate change & Flood myth. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 119 publications receiving 7661 citations. Previous affiliations of Stewart W. Franks include Lancaster University & Newcastle University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences

TL;DR: The IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) as discussed by the authors is a new initiative launched by the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) aimed at formulating and implementing appropriate science programmes to engage and energize the scientific community, in a coordinated manner, towards achieving major advances in the capacity to make predictions in ungauged basins.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the total predictive uncertainty and its decomposition into input and structural components under different inference scenarios, and highlight the inherent limitations of inferring inaccurate hydrologic models using rainfall runoff data with large unknown errors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory

TL;DR: In this article, a Bayesian total error analysis methodology for rainfall-runoff models is proposed, which allows the modeler to directly and transparently incorporate, test, and refine existing understanding of all sources of data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Application

TL;DR: The Bayesian total error analysis (BATEA) methodology directly addresses both input and output errors in hydrological modeling, requiring the modeler to make explicit, rather than implicit, assumptions about the likely extent of data uncertainty.