E
Erwin Zehe
Researcher at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Publications - 157
Citations - 7975
Erwin Zehe is an academic researcher from Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Surface runoff & Soil water. The author has an hindex of 43, co-authored 147 publications receiving 7033 citations. Previous affiliations of Erwin Zehe include University of Potsdam & Technische Universität München.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences
Murugesu Sivapalan,Kuniyoshi Takeuchi,Stewart W. Franks,V. K. Gupta,H. Karambiri,V. Lakshmi,Xu Liang,Jeffrey J. McDonnell,Eduardo Mario Mendiondo,P. E. O'Connell,Taikan Oki,John W. Pomeroy,Daniel Schertzer,Stefan Uhlenbrook,Erwin Zehe +14 more
TL;DR: The IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) as discussed by the authors is a new initiative launched by the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) aimed at formulating and implementing appropriate science programmes to engage and energize the scientific community, in a coordinated manner, towards achieving major advances in the capacity to make predictions in ungauged basins.
Journal ArticleDOI
A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review
Markus Hrachowitz,Hubert H. G. Savenije,Günter Blöschl,Jeffrey J. McDonnell,Murugesu Sivapalan,John W. Pomeroy,Berit Arheimer,Theresa Blume,Martyn P. Clark,Uwe Ehret,Fabrizio Fenicia,Jim Freer,Alexander Gelfan,Hoshin V. Gupta,Denis A. Hughes,Rolf Hut,Alberto Montanari,Saket Pande,Doerthe Tetzlaff,Peter Troch,Stefan Uhlenbrook,Thibaut Wagener,Hessel Winsemius,Ross Woods,Erwin Zehe,Christophe Cudennec +25 more
TL;DR: The Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB) initiative of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) launched in 2003 and concluded by the PUB Symposium 2012 held in Delft (23-25 October 2012), set out to shift the scientific culture of hydrology towards improved scientific understanding of hydrological processes, as well as associated uncertainties and the development of models with increasing realism and predictive power as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI
HESS Opinions "Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data?"
TL;DR: It is argued that BC is currently often used in an invalid way: it is added to the GCM/RCM model chain without sufficient proof that the consistency of the latter is maintained, and narrows the uncertainty range of simulations and predictions without, however, providing a satisfactory physical justification.
Should we apply bias correction to global and regional climate model data
TL;DR: The authors argued that bias correction, which has a considerable influence on the results of impact studies, is not a valid procedure in the way it is currently used: it impairs the advantages of Circulation Models which are based on established physical laws by altering spatiotemporal field 10
Journal ArticleDOI
Rainfall—runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared event-based runoff coefficients with four well-established separation methods, as well as a newly developed separation method, which is based on the theory of linear storage, and found that runoff coefficients reported in the literature often convey less information than required to allow for catchment classification.