The clinical relevance of T cells in the control of a diverse set of human cancers is now beyond doubt. However, the nature of the antigens that allow the immune system to distinguish cancer cells from noncancer cells has long remained obscure. Recent technological innovations have made it possible to dissect the immune response to patient-specific neoantigens that arise as a consequence of tumor-specific mutations, and emerging data suggest that recognition of such neoantigens is a major factor in the activity of clinical immunotherapies. These observations indicate that neoantigen load may form a biomarker in cancer immunotherapy and provide an incentive for the development of novel therapeutic approaches that selectively enhance T cell reactivity against this class of antigens.

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/348/6230/69.full.pdf

Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy

After a century of controversy, the notion that the immune system regulates cancer development is experiencing a new resurgence. An overwhelming amount of data from animal models--together with compelling data from human patients--indicate that a functional cancer immunosurveillance process indeed exists that acts as an extrinsic tumor suppressor. However, it has also become clear that the immune system can facilitate tumor progression, at least in part, by sculpting the immunogenic phenotype of tumors as they develop. The recognition that immunity plays a dual role in the complex interactions between tumors and the host prompted a refinement of the cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis into one termed "cancer immunoediting." In this review, we summarize the history of the cancer immunosurveillance controversy and discuss its resolution and evolution into the three Es of cancer immunoediting--elimination, equilibrium, and escape.

The three Es of cancer immunoediting.

The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting

Pan-cancer Immunogenomic Analyses Reveal Genotype-Immunophenotype Relationships and Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Blockade

Natural killer cells can discriminate between normal cells and cells that do not express adequate amounts of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. The discovery, both in mouse and in human, of MHC-specific inhibitory receptors clarified the molecular basis of this important NK cell function. However, the triggering receptors responsible for positive NK cell stimulation remained elusive until recently. Some of these receptors have now been identified in humans, thus shedding some light on the molecular mechanisms involved in NK cell activation during the process of natural cytotoxicity. Three novel, NK-specific, triggering surface molecules (NKp46, NKp30, and NKp44) have been identified. They represent the first members of a novel emerging group of receptors collectively termed natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCR). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to NCR block to differing extents the NK-mediated lysis of various tumors. Moreover, lysis of certain tumors can be virtually abrogated by the simultaneous masking of the three NCRs. There is a coordinated surface expression of the three NCRs, their surface density varying in different individuals and also in the NK cells isolated from a given individual. A direct correlation exists between the surface density of NCR and the ability of NK cells to kill various tumors. NKp46 is the only NCR involved in human NK-mediated killing of murine target cells. Accordingly, a homologue of NKp46 has been detected in mouse. Molecular cloning of NCR revealed novel members of the Ig superfamily displaying a low degree of similarity to each other and to known human molecules. NCRs are coupled to different signal transducing adaptor proteins, including CD3 zeta, Fc epsilon RI gamma, and KARAP/DAP12. Another triggering NK receptor is NKG2D. It appears to play either a complementary or a synergistic role with NCRs. Thus, the triggering of NK cells in the process of tumor cell lysis may often depend on the concerted action of NCR and NKG2D. In some instances, however, it may uniquely depend upon the activity of NCR or NKG2D only. Strict NKG2D-dependency can be appreciated using clones that, in spite of their NCR(dull) phenotype, efficiently lyse certain epithelial tumors or leukemic cell lines. Other triggering surface molecules including 2B4 and the novel NKp80 appear to function as coreceptors rather than as true receptors. Indeed, they can induce natural cytotoxicity only when co-engaged with a triggering receptor. While an altered expression or function of NCR or NKG2D is being explored as a possible cause of immunological disorders, 2B4 dysfunction has already been associated with a severe form of immunodeficiency. Indeed, in patients with the X-linked lymphoproliferative disease, the inability to control Epstein-Barr virus infections may be consequent to a major dysfunction of 2B4 that exerts inhibitory instead of activating functions.

Activating receptors and coreceptors involved in human natural killer cell-mediated cytolysis.

Implications for immunosurveillance of altered hla class i phenotypes in human tumours

https://www.cell.com/trends/immunology/pdf/0167-5699(93)90264-L.pdf

Natural history of HLA expression during tumour development

Tumor immune escape variants can be identified in human and experimental tumors. A variety of different strategies are used by tumor cells to avoid recognition by different immune effector mechanisms. Among these escape routes, alteration of MHC class I cell surface expression is one of the mechanisms most widely used by tumor cells. In this review we focus our attention on the T-cell immune selection of MHC class I–deficient tumor variants. Different altered MHC class I phenotypes that originate from multiple molecular mechanisms can be identified in human tumors. MHC-deficient tumor clones can escape T-cell immune responses, but are in theory more susceptible to NK-cell–mediated lysis. In this context, we also review the controversial issue of the aberrant expression of nonclassical HLA class I molecules, particularly HLA-G, in tumors. This expression may be relevant in tumor cells that have lost the capacity to interact with NK inhibitory receptors—namely, those tumor cells with no HLA-B or HLA-C expression. Most published studies have not analyzed these possibilities and do not provide information about the complete HLA-A, HLA-B, or HLA-C molecule profiles of the tumors studied. In contrast, HLA-E has been reported to be expressed in some tumor cell lines with very low HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C expression, suggesting that HLA-E may indeed, in some cases, play a role by inhibiting NK lysis of cells that otherwise would be destroyed by NK cells. Finally, we provide evidence that the status of the immune system in the tumor-bearing animal is capable of defining the MHC profile of the tumor cells. In other words, MHC class I–negative metastatic colonies are produced in immunocompetent animals, and MHC class I–positive colonies in T-cell immunodeficient individuals.

The selection of tumor variants with altered expression of classical and nonclassical MHC class I molecules: implications for tumor immune escape.

HLA class I antigen abnormalities and immune escape by malignant cells.

The ability of cancer cells to escape from the natural or immunotherapy-induced antitumor immune response is often associated with alterations in the tumor cell surface expression of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I antigens. Considerable knowledge has been gained on the prevalence of various patterns of MHC Class I defects and the underlying molecular mechanisms in different types of cancer. In contrast, few data are available on the changes in MHC Class I expression happening during the course of cancer immunotherapy. We have recently proposed that the progression or regression of a tumor lesion in cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy could be predetermined by the molecular mechanism responsible for the MHC Class I alteration and not by the type of immunotherapy used, i.e., interleukin-2 (IL-2), Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), interferon-alpha (IFN-α), peptides alone, dendritic cells loaded with peptides, protein-bound polysaccharide etc. If the molecular alteration responsible for the changes in MHC Class I expression is reversible by cytokines (“soft” lesion), the MHC Class I expression will be upregulated, the specific T cell–mediated response will increase and the lesion will regress. However, if the molecular defect is structural (“hard” lesion), the MHC Class I expression will remain low, the escape mechanism will prevail and the primary tumor or the metastatic lesion will progress. According to this idea, the nature of the preexisting MHC Class I lesion in the cancer cell has a crucial impact determining the final outcome of cancer immunotherapy. In this article, we discuss the importance of these two types of molecular mechanisms of MHC Class I–altered expression.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ijc.25270

Teresa Cabrera

Papers

Implications for immunosurveillance of altered hla class i phenotypes in human tumours

Natural history of HLA expression during tumour development

The selection of tumor variants with altered expression of classical and nonclassical MHC class I molecules: implications for tumor immune escape.

HLA class I antigen abnormalities and immune escape by malignant cells.

"Hard" and "soft" lesions underlying the HLA class I alterations in cancer cells: implications for immunotherapy.