Showing papers by "Todd E. DeFor published in 2011"

Delayed platelet recovery after allogeneic transplantation: a predictor of increased treatment-related mortality and poorer survival

Abstract: Delayed platelet recovery (DPR) is common after allo-SCT. Insufficient data on risk factors and association with OS and TRM are available. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all allografts at the University of Minnesota between 2000 and 2005 to characterize the frequency of DPR (platelets <50 000/μL by day 60), risk factors and related complications. A total of 850 patients with hematological malignancies and benign disorders were included. Myeloablative (MA) conditioning was used in 65% of the patients and 45% received umbilical cord blood (UCB) grafts. The 60-day cumulative incidence of platelet recovery was 40% in UCB, 57% in unrelated donor (URD) and 74% in sibling donor. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the variables associated with DPR were MA (versus reduced intensity) conditioning, graft source other than sibling donor, ABO major mismatch, recipient CMV-positive serostatus, the presence of grade II-IV acute GVHD and slower neutrophil recovery. These data demonstrate that DPR is frequent after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, especially after UCB. DPR is a significant independent risk factor for increased TRM and poorer OS along with HLA-mismatched URD, but not UCB, grade II-IV acute GVHD, old age and advanced disease stage.

Peritransplant palifermin use and lymphocyte recovery after T-cell replete, matched related allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Abstract: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is often the only curative option for people with otherwise fatal hematologic malignancies. As the number of allo-HCT procedures continues to increase [1], it is increasingly clear that a major obstacle to success is delayed immune recovery, which puts atients at risk for a wide variety of opportunistic infections [2-7][8]. Additionally, rapid early lymphocyte recovery may serve as a surrogate predictor of better transplant outcomes. Robust recovery of absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) early after transplantation is associated with improved survival following autologous, sibling, unrelated bone marrow, peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood transplantation [9-15]. There is a clear need to develop strategies to accelerate and improve immune reconstitution (IR). Several novel approaches have been successfully tested in preclinical animal models and early human clinical trials. These include pre-transplant androgen ablation, keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), and a p53 inhibitor or post-transplant administration of IL-7, IL-15, growth hormone, or insulin-like growth factor-1 [16-20]. KGF is a potent growth factor belonging to the fibroblast growth factor family that stimulates epithelial growth and differentiation, without affecting the non-epithelial cells that lack the FGFR2-IIIb receptor. In the thymus KGF is produced locally by mesenchymal cells and acts on thymic epithelial cells (TECs) [18, 21]. Through its trophic effects on TECs, KGF facilitates normal thymopoiesis which is required for naive T cell generation [22]. In murine allo-HCT models, KGF treatment improved thymopoiesis and enhanced T cell IR [18, 23]. In a nonhuman primate model of autologous hematopoietic cell rescue following myeloablation, peri-transplant KGF administration led to the preservation of thymic architecture for up to 12 months after HCT [24]. In the same study, KGF treated animals had higher frequencies of naive T cells compared to the control group. Another preclinical study which combined KGF with androgen depletion led to enhanced thymopoiesis characterized by a broad V-beta T cell repertoire [25]. To assess the GvHD protective potential of KGF, a phase I/II randomized, placebo controlled trial of recombinant human KGF (palifermin) was performed from 2000-2003 in 100 patients undergoing T cell replete, MRD allo-HCT following myeloablative conditioning [26, 27]. The focus of this study was to determine the impact of KGF on GVHD. Detailed IR was not studied within the trial. Because ALC is associated with transplant outcomes [9-15]. we questioned whether there might be differential effects of KGF on early ALC recovery. Here, we report our retrospective analysis using data from our earlier trial to assess the effects of peritransplant use of palifermin on ALC recovery at following HCT. This is the first report analyzing the results of palifermin and lymphocyte recovery in humans. We tested ALCs after transplant in the palifermin and placebo treatment groups. As shown in figure 1a, the median ALC at days 30, 60 and 100 after transplant did not significantly differ in the palifermin vs. placebo arms (600 × 106/L vs 600 × 106/L; P = 0.26, 500 × 106/L vs 600 × 106/L; P = 0.86, 600 × 106/L vs 700 × 106/L, P = 0.19). Likewise, there was no influence of the palifermin dose and subsequent ALC recovery post-transplant ALC (figure 1b). As well, palifermin did not impact ALC based on the conditioning regimen (Bu/Cy vs. Cy/TBI), recipient age and the presence of aGVHD (data not shown). As previously reported, in this trial, palifermin use was not associated with shorter time to engraftment, aGvHD, survival or infectious complications after transplant. However, palifermin modestly decreased mucositis [26, 27]. Figure 1 Post-transplant ALC in palifermin and placebo groups Based on prior studies [9-15], we also examined whether differential lymphocyte counts were associated with transplant outcomes. Patients with an ALC above the medin at D+30 (>600 ×106/L) showed a trend for improved PFS (49% (95% CI, 32-65%) vs. 29% (95% CI 16-43%), p=0.07) (figure 2a). There was no association between D+30 ALC and disease recurrence (28% (95% CI 14-42%) vs. 23% (95% CI 10-36%), p=0.6) (figure 2b). There were trends toward less 2 year TRM (95% CI 18% (6-30%) vs. 35% (95% CI 20-50%), p=0.1) and grade II-IV aGVHD (31% (95% CI 17-45%) vs. 47% (95% CI 32-62%, p=0.14) in patients with an ALC>600 at D+30 after transplant (figures 2c and 2d). These rates were unaffected by KGF therapy. Figure 2 Transplant outcomes based on ALC at day 30 In this first allotransplant palifermin dose escalation trial, using ALC as a marker for IR, we found that peri-transplant palifermin had no impact on ALC at day 30, 60 or 100 after allo-HCT. These results differ from rodent studies [22, 25] and a non-human primate study [24] where KGF was associated with protection of TECs from radiation-induced damage, resulting in improved thymopoiesis and peripheral IR after transplant. Numerous explanations may account for our the findings including suboptimal palifermin dose or dosing schedule, existing pre-transplant chemotherapy-induced TEC damage or a limited potency of this agent on human TECs. ALC is a relatively crude marker for IR and the lack of information on various T cell subsets, T cell receptor Vβ repertoire and newly formed T cells (i.e., thymic excision circles) limits our ability to detect any effects of palifermin on the naive vs. homeostatically expanded T cells. In addition, only three patients were less than 18 years in this study, with the median age being 47. The lack of accelerated IR and higher ALC with palifermin could also be related to a reduced effectiveness of palifermin on atrophied thymic tissue, present in older subjects. Alternatively, a recent study by Chakraverty et al found that the degree of in vivo T cell depletion adversely affects ALC recovery post allo-HCT, underscoring the importance of graft-derived T cells in early ALC recovery [29]. Therefore it is possible that the early lymphocyte recovery after T cell replete HCT is not reflective of thymic output and may be more related to homeostatic proliferation of existing T cells. In this scenario, ALC may be unaffected by palifermin. In addition, significant aGVHD occurred in nearly half the patients on this study. This complication is associated with thymic injury and requires extended immunosuppressive therapy. Thus aGVHD (or its treatment) might have confounded any potential of palifermin to augment IR. However, there was no significant difference in ALCs between the palifermin and placebo treated groups, even after excluding patients with aGvHD (data not shown). However it is still possible that the GvHD prophylaxis itself (which were not used in the preclinical models) may have blunted any potential benefit of palifermin on lymphocyte recovery, considering that most GVHD prophylactic agents inhibit T cell production and expansion. Previous studies show a positive correlation between early ALC and transplant with outcome measures [9, 14, 30]. While the clinical impact of ALC recovery was only a secondary aim of this study, we observed a trend towards improved PFS and lower TRM in patients above the median ALC at day 30, consistent with other reports [13-15, 30]. Interestingly, a lower day 30 ALC was associated with a trend towards more frequent grade II-IV aGvHD. Thus, it is possible that before becoming clinically evident, aGvHD is heralded by delayed recovery of ALC. Delayed IR continues to be a major problem after allo-HCT. Based on this analysis, palifermin alone is unlikely to significantly improve post allo-HCT immune recovery, at least following T-cell replete allo-HCT. In recent years there have been significant advances in understanding the mechanisms behind delayed immune reconstitution and some novel interventions have been successful in pre-clinical models (reviewed in [28]). Perhaps strategies combining two or more agents, shown to be promising in pre-clinical models, may be needed to overcome the profound immune deficiency which follows allo-HCT.

cohort report childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy: the largest single-institution Outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for

Abstract: http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/118/7/1971.full.html Updated information and services can be found at: (1710 articles) Transplantation • (1293 articles) Free Research Articles • Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at: http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints Information about ordering reprints may be found online at: http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at: