Institution
Cochlear Limited
Company•Sydney, New South Wales, Australia•
About: Cochlear Limited is a company organization based out in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cochlear implant & Hearing loss. The organization has 1290 authors who have published 1479 publications receiving 33109 citations. The organization is also known as: кохлеарные Americas & COCHLEAR LIMITED.
Topics: Cochlear implant, Hearing loss, Speech perception, Hearing aid, Implant
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Investigating outcomes and predictive factors for a group of prelingually hearing-impaired adults who received a cochlear implant found that the variability in post-operative outcomes can be predicted to some extent from the hearing history and language abilities of the individual patient.
Abstract: Objective: This study investigated outcomes and predictive factors, specifically language skills, for a group of prelingually hearing-impaired adults who received a cochlear implant Design: Speech perception data, demographic information, and other related variables such as communication mode, residual hearing, and receptive language abilities were explored Pre- and post-implant speech perception scores were compared and multiple regression analysis was used to identify significant predictive relationships Study sample: The study included 43 adults with a prelingual onset of hearing loss, who proceeded with cochlear implantation at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne, Australia Results: The majority of patients experienced benefit from their cochlear implants, with 88% demonstrating significant improvement in speech perception performance Volunteers achieved better post-operative speech perception scores if they had a shorter duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss, bett
14 citations
••
TL;DR: Patients with SSD showed improvement regarding communication skills and sound discrimination in a noisy environment and subjective improvement was evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-B).
Abstract: Objective: Evaluate auditory results and communicative benefits in adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) treated with cochlear implantation.Study Design: Observational descriptive case series.Setting: Hospital Universitario Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota.Patients: Ten patients with profound post-lingual SSD were treated with cochlear implantation between January 2011 and March 2016. Two patients were excluded because of incomplete follow-up.Interventions: Medical records included demographic information, pre and post-operative audiometric results, and binaural and monoaural speech discrimination tests in three sound-in-noise configurationswith the cochlear implant turned on and off, respectively. Subjective improvement was evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-B).Main Outcome Measures: Pre and post-operative audiometric and speech discrimination results, post-operative binaural and monoaural speech discrimination in noise results, and APHAB and SSQ-B questionnaire results.Results: Significant improvement in speech discrimination in a noisy environment was found when the noise and signal were presented from the front, and when the signal was presented to the implanted ear and the noise to the healthy ear. SSQ-B questionnaire showed improvement in all subscales, while APHAB showed improvement in all subscales except sound aversion.Conclusion: Patients with SSD showed improvement regarding communication skills and sound discrimination in a noisy environment.
14 citations
••
TL;DR: Lip-reading and tracking results indicate that all patients have attained an enhancement of lip-reading ability with the use of the device, suggesting that improved general communication skills have been provided for each UCSF/Storz patient.
14 citations
•
TL;DR: It is recommended that hand-held systems have a direct readout to the programming station and that audio and visual feedback be improved for all units.
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate intraoperative electrically elicited stapedius reflex thresholds (ESRTs) measured through three different cochlear implant systems: the Nucleus Mini 22, the Clarion Enhanced Bipolar, and the Med-El Combi-40. Subjects and Methods: Relations between intraoperative ESRT and postoperative maximum comfort level (MCL) were examined in seven children (4 Nucleus, 2 Clarion, and I Med-El) and one adult (Clarion). Results: Preliminary results indicated most ESRTs were either higher or both higher and lower (across the electrode array within a subject) than MCLs. All systems provided satisfactory means for measuring ERSTs. Conclusion: It is recommended that hand-held systems have a direct readout to the programming station and that audio and visual feedback be improved for all units
14 citations
•
13 Mar 2012TL;DR: In this paper, a method for processing sound that includes, generating one or more noise component estimates relating to an electrical representation of the sound and generating an associated confidence measure for the noise component estimate is presented.
Abstract: A method for processing sound that includes, generating one or more noise component estimates relating to an electrical representation of the sound and generating an associated confidence measure for the one or more noise component estimates. The method further comprises processing, based on the confidence measure, the sound.
14 citations
Authors
Showing all 1293 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Marc Moonen | 66 | 796 | 17837 |
Robert K. Shepherd | 59 | 255 | 10679 |
Matthew W. Kelley | 53 | 141 | 9657 |
Frank R. Lin | 51 | 211 | 12431 |
Peter S. Roland | 47 | 239 | 7660 |
Peter J. Blamey | 47 | 208 | 7316 |
Richard C. Dowell | 46 | 192 | 7104 |
Olivier Sterkers | 46 | 356 | 8162 |
Blake C. Papsin | 46 | 240 | 6712 |
Stephen O'Leary | 45 | 238 | 6841 |
Karl Hörmann | 44 | 379 | 7001 |
Geoffrey A. Manley | 44 | 183 | 6184 |
Karen A. Gordon | 43 | 135 | 4594 |
Hugh J. McDermott | 43 | 146 | 5254 |
David M. Baguley | 43 | 240 | 6533 |