Innlandet Hospital Trust

About: Innlandet Hospital Trust is a healthcare organization based out in Brumunddal, Norway. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Dementia. The organization has 387 authors who have published 1302 publications receiving 37753 citations.

Psychosomatic symptoms and stressful working conditions among Palestinian nurses: a cross-sectional study.

Abstract: Background: High levels of perceived stressful working conditions have been found to have an adverse effect on physical and mental health. Objectives: To examine the associations between self-reported stressful working conditions and Psychosomatic Symptoms (PSS), and to investigate possible gender differences. Methods: The present cross-sectional study comprises 430 nurses employed in Hebron district, Palestine. Self-reported stressful working conditions were recorded, and a Psychosomatic Symptoms Check list was used to assess prevalence of PSS. Findings: Median score on the psychosomatic symptom checklist for the group was 11, (range 1–21). Women reported more symptoms than men, with medians 11.6 and 10.0, respectively (p = .0001). PSS were associated with more self-reported stressful working conditions for both men (p < .0001) and women (p < .0001). The association was strongest among men. Conclusions: PSS were associated with high self-reported stressful working conditions, and this association was str...

A combination of low serum concentrations of vitamins K1 and D is associated with increased risk of hip fractures in elderly Norwegians: a NOREPOS study

Abstract: The present study investigated the risk of incident hip fractures according to serum concentrations of vitamin K1 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in elderly Norwegians during long-term follow-up. The results showed that the combination of low concentrations of both vitamin D and K1 provides a significant risk factor for hip fractures. This case-cohort study aims to investigate the associations between serum vitamin K1 and hip fracture and the possible effect of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) on this association. The source cohort was 21,774 men and women aged 65 to 79 years who attended Norwegian community-based health studies during 1994–2001. Hip fractures were identified through hospital registers during median follow-up of 8.2 years. Vitamins were determined in serum obtained at baseline in all hip fracture cases (n = 1090) and in a randomly selected subcohort (n = 1318). Cox proportional hazards regression with quartiles of serum vitamin K1 as explanatory variable was performed. Analyses were further performed with the following four groups as explanatory variable: I: vitamin K1 ≥ 0.76 and 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/l, II: vitamin K1 ≥ 0.76 and 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l, III: vitamin K1 < 0.76 and 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/l, and IV: vitamin K1 < 0.76 and 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l. Age- and sex-adjusted analyses revealed an inverse association between quartiles of vitamin K1 and the risk of hip fracture. Further, a 50 % higher risk of hip fracture was observed in subjects with both low vitamin K1 and 25(OH)D compared with subjects with high vitamin K1 and 25(OH)D (HR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.18–1.90). The association remained statistically significant after adjusting for body mass index, smoking, triglycerides, and serum α-tocopherol. No increased risk was observed in the groups low in one vitamin only. Combination of low concentrations of vitamin K1 and 25(OH)D is associated with increased risk of hip fractures.

Recognition and treatment recommendations for generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive episode: a cross-sectional study among general practitioners in norway.

Abstract: Objective: Undertreatment by general practitioners (GPs) of patients who have generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive episodes (MDEs) is well known. Overtreatment by GPs of patients without these disorders has received little attention. The aim of this study was to estimate GPs' recommended overtreatment (recommendation of treatment to patients who, on the basis of diagnostic self-ratings, had neither GAD nor MDE) and undertreatment (not recommending treatment to patients who, on the basis of self-ratings, had GAD or MDE) and to describe patient variables associated with overtreatment. Method: In a cross-sectional design (during 3 consecutive days in September 2001), 136 Norwegian GPs evaluated 1332 patients. Diagnostic reference standards were patients' ratings of validated DSM-IV criteria–based questionnaires. GPs identified somatic diseases and mental disorders according to all accumulated information. For their diagnoses of MDE and GAD, the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale was used as a supplement, and GPs suggested treatment for these disorders. Results: The GPs recommended overtreatment in 11% (132/1245) of cases. The rates of under-treatment were 64% (18/28) and 49% (23/47) for GAD and MDE, respectively. For comorbid GAD and MDE the rate of undertreatment was 17% (2/12). Mental reason for patient's current visit and poor self-rated subjective health were strongly associated with overtreatment. Conclusion: Our preliminary study indicates that overtreatment by GPs of patients who, according to self-rating, do not have GAD or MDE could represent a problem. Criteria-based diagnostic descriptions might be of limited relevance for the practice of GPs, and the issue of overtreatment should be investigated further in studies with improved design.