scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Applied Psychology in 1981"








Journal ArticleDOI

20 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Focusing on some key issues that have attracted particular attention from psychologists and seeking to show, with examples from British research, how organizational psychology has developed and is continuing to develop as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Focuses on some key issues that have attracted particular attention from psychologists and seeks to show, with examples from British research, how organizational psychology has developed and is continuing to develop.

17 citations





Journal ArticleDOI








Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors found that student ratings are influenced by a variety of different extraneous variables, and not only by single variables in isolation, but also by the interaction of variables, such as class and instructor variables.
Abstract: Summary 1 It is clear from this review that student ratings are influenced by a variety of different extraneous variables, and not only by single variables in isolation, but also by the interaction of variables. Although there has been a recent resurgence of research in this area which has contributed to our understanding of the effects of these variables, a considerable amount of additional research is needed in order to explicate the direct and interacting effect of the relevant variables. Research from a wide variety of instructional systems, and cross-cultural research is particularly needed. 2 Class variables seem to be the most potent set of variables since almost all variables related to the class situation have been found to influence rating. The weakest set of variables seems to be the student variables. With a few notable exceptions (e.g. student grades and grade expectations), the findings with respect to student variables have been inconsistent. At best, the effects of instructor (but non-instructional) variables seem to be intermediate in strength to class and student variables. 3 The findings of this review suggest that individual ratings must be interpreted in light of the situation in which the ratings are made. At the very least, departmental norms should be established along dimensions based on class variables such as size, level, subject matter, etc. (cf. Hoffman, 1978), and indeed, until their effects are better understood, norms should also be based on certain of the student and instructor variables.