scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer

TLDR
The authors question the validity of a basic assumption of the study, namely, that rising PSA after radical therapy is indicative of recurrent or residual PCa, and expand on a number of points raised in the editorial.
Abstract
We agree with the introductory comments in the editorial by Ehdaie and Touijer [1]. Our understanding of the role of endocrine factors, such as androgen synthesis, in the tissue of castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) has improved rapidly and may result in more effective ways of interacting with the androgen receptor with the promise of rapid clinical application. We also agree that despite availability of data from several randomized controlled trials [2–4] ,p rogress with respect to the application of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) for PCa prevention has been less convincing. However, the finding of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after potentially curative management of PCa is one of the conditions with which clinicians are most frequently confronted, and no first-line evidence-based treatment is available. We are therefore confronted with a difficult question: How much uncertainty around treatment decisions is acceptable in a situation of ignorance of the best management of proven minimal PCa progression? We would like to expand on a number of points raised in the editorial [1]. The authors question the validity of a basic assumption of our study [5], namely, that rising PSA after radical therapy is indicative of recurrent or residual PCa. They argue that the effect on PSA doubling time seen in our study may be in part due to ‘‘PSA changes in benign prostatic tissue,’’ presumably left behind after radiotherapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). Although this possibility cannot be entirely excluded, our data do not support it. Residual benign prostatic tissue left behind at RP is an extremely rare event in the hands of any surgeon; after RT, benign PSA-producing tissue always remains. Data from the REDUCE study showed stability of PSA values over a 2-yr period in 2566 men treated with placebo and without a

read more

Citations
More filters

Factores de riesgo y medidas de prevención del cáncer de próstata: basis para la enfermería Risk factors and prevention actions in prostate cancer: fundamentals for nursing

TL;DR: In this article, a reflexive article about risk factors and prostate cancer prevention actions is presented to contribute to the approach of men, especially during nursing consultation, where low-fat diet and a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, legumes, grains and others, are related as capable of potentially minimizing the risks.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

TL;DR: Several clinical parameters help predict the outcomes of men with PSA elevation after radical prostatectomy, and these data may be useful in the design of clinical trials, the identification of men for enrollment into experimental protocols, and counseling men regarding the timing of administration of adjuvant therapies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

TL;DR: Dutasteride could provide a beneficial adjunct to active surveillance for men with low-risk prostate cancer who chose to be followed up with active surveillance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Treatment with finasteride following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

TL;DR: Treatment with finasteride delays but does not prevent the rise in serum PSA observed in untreated patients with detectable PSA levels after radical prostatectomy, suggesting that the effect on PSA reflects a direct effect on tumor growth without affecting the initial response to subsequent hormonal therapy.
Related Papers (5)