Journal ArticleDOI
A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes)
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
High levels of character congruence were observed among 89 biochemical and morphological synapomorphies scored on 10 species of Epicrates, and the consensus cladogram was consistent with the phylogenetic interpretation attached to the resulting hypothesis, which is a consensus of two equally parsimonious cladograms.Abstract:
-Character congruence, the principle of using all the relevant data, and character independence are important concepts in phylogenetic inference, because they relate directly to the evidence on which hypotheses are based. Taxonomic congruence, which is agreement among patterns of taxonomic relationships, is less important, because its connection to the underlying character evidence is indirect and often imperfect. Also, taxonomic congruence is difficult to justify, because of the arbitrariness involved in choosing a consensus method and index with which to estimate agreement. High levels of character congruence were observed among 89 biochemical and morphological synapomorphies scored on 10 species of Epicrates. Such agreement is consistent with the phylogenetic interpretation attached to the resulting hypothesis, which is a consensus of two equally parsimonious cladograms: (cenchria (angulifer (striatus ((chrysogaster, exsul) (inornatus, subflavus) (gracilis (fordii, monensis)))))). Relatively little (11.4%) of the character incongruence was due to the disparity between the biochemical and morphological data sets. Each of the clades in the consensus cladogram was confirmed by two or more unique and unreversed novelties, and six of the eight clades were corroborated by biochemical and morphological evidence. Such combinations of characters add confidence to the phylogenetic hypothesis, assuming the qualitatively different kinds of data are more likely to count as independent than are observations drawn from the same character system. Most of the incongruence occurred in the skeletal subset of characters, and much of that independent evolution seemed to be the result of paedomorphosis. [Biochemical data; character congruence; character independence; Epicrates; evidence; morphological data; paedomorphosis; phylogenetic systematics; taxonomic congruence; total evidence.] The goals of cladistics and phenetics are different. The former estimates phylogeny (Hennig, 1966), the latter seeks stability and convenience in classification (Sokal, 1986:424). Unfortunately, these objectives have become confused, especially where stability is concerned. For example, Hillis (1987:35) stated that "[c]lassifications are best based on information in common among multiple data sets (i.e., consensus trees), whereas the best estimate of phylogeny and best estimate of character evolution are represented in the analysis of the combined data sets." The importance of a conservative information storage-retrieval system is undeniable (e.g., International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 1985:3), and pheneticists sought justification for their methods in this simple truth (Sokal and Sneath, 1963). Even cladists attributed some significance to stability per se, because the lack of it confounds attempts to discover the single historical pattern (Schuh and Farris, 1981). Not unexpectedly, cladists responded (e.g., Farris, 1971) to the proposition that phenetic methods produce more stable classifications (e.g., Sokal and Sneath, 1963: 264). Analytical precision was demanded by the contestants, and an incredible array of consensus methods and indexes were developed (see lists below). It is important to bear in mind that only information on taxonomic grouping can be used to evaluate the pheneticists' claims, because character congruence is difficult to judge in phenetic analyses. Eventually, the controversy over stability became a relative issue, with cladists arguing greater stability for classifications produced by their methods, as if stability was a goal of phylogenetic systematics. Further, Nelson and Platnick (1981:219; see also Nelson, 1979) attempted to justify cla-read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Testing significance of incongruence
Journal ArticleDOI
The {ITS} region of nuclear ribosomal {DNA}: {A} valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny
Bruce G. Baldwin,Michael J. Sanderson,J. Mark Porter,Martin F. Wojciechowski,Christopher S. Campbell,Michael J. Donoghue +5 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life.
TL;DR: This work has demonstrated the power of the phylogenomics approach, which has the potential to provide answers to several fundamental evolutionary questions, but challenges for the future have also been revealed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging
TL;DR: It is argued that to better deal with the large multilocus datasets brought on by phylogenomics, and to better align the fields of phylogeography and phylogenetics, the primacy of species trees should be embraced.
Journal ArticleDOI
A review of long-branch attraction
TL;DR: It is argued that since outgroup taxa almost always represent long branches and are as such a hazard towards misplacing long branched ingroup taxa, phylogenetic analyses should always be run with and without the outgroups included.
References
More filters
Book
The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection
TL;DR: Barnes & Noble Classics as mentioned in this paper is a collection of books based on the "The Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin, which is part of the "Barnes and Noble Classics" series.
Book
Principles of numerical taxonomy
Robert R. Sokal,P.H.A. Sneath +1 more
TL;DR: The authors continued the story of psychology with added research and enhanced content from the most dynamic areas of the field, such as cognition, gender and diversity studies, neuroscience and more, while at the same time using the most effective teaching approaches and learning tools.
MonographDOI
On the origin of the species by means of natural selection
TL;DR: One of the few revolutionary works of science that is engrossingly readable, "The Origin of Species" not only launched the science of modern biology but also has influenced virtually all subsequent literary, philosophical, and religious thinking.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans
Arnold G. Kluge,James S. Farris +1 more