A GAC biofilm reactor for the continuous degradation of 4-chlorophenol: treatment efficiency and microbial analysis.
read more
Citations
Biofilms: implications in bioremediation.
Biology of Freshwater Pollution.
Anaerobic degradation of adsorbable organic halides (AOX) from pulp and paper industry wastewater
Adsorption, desorption and bioregeneration in the treatment of 2-chlorophenol with activated carbon
Characterization of Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila NCW-702 biofilm for implication in the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
References
ES&T Special Report: Priority pollutants: I-a perspective view
Ground-water microbiology and geochemistry
Biology of freshwater pollution
Biology of Freshwater Pollution.
Channel Structures in Aerobic Biofilms of Fixed-Film Reactors Treating Contaminated Groundwater
Related Papers (5)
The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm
Frequently Asked Questions (21)
Q2. What could be the cause of the clogging of the reactor?
Excessive growth could lead to the clogging of the reactor and, consequently, to decreases in the biofilm activity because the development of anaerobic and dead zones may not contribute to 4-CP biodegradation due to poor contact with the influent, or to oxygen debt.
Q3. What are the two common approaches used to treat chlorinated organic compounds?
Adsorption and biological treatment are two common approaches used to treat such compounds (Jonge et al. 1996; Caldeira et al. 1999).
Q4. How was the biodegradation of the CP observed?
Establishment of the 4-CP degrading biofilmAfter inoculating the reactor and operating it in a closed recirculating flow mode, biodegradation of 4-CP was observed after 3 weeks as the accumulation of chloride ion in the recirculating vessel.
Q5. What are the common methods used to treat chlorinated organic compounds?
Biological waste treatment techniques for water and effluents contaminated with chlorinated organic compounds often include the utilization of biofilm reactors.
Q6. How many g of GAC were extracted from the biofilm column?
Samples of approximately 0.5–1 g were taken in duplicate, collected from the inner middle section of the bed; after each sampling the amount of GAC extracted was replaced with fresh GAC.
Q7. Why was the colonized GAC transferred to a new column?
Due to a disruption of the reactor (fractured glass), which occurred at day 75, the colonized GAC was transferred to a new column (same dimensions); care was taken so that the biofilm matrix was disturbed to a minimum.
Q8. What was the filtration of the air before entering the vessel?
Air was filtered (Nalgene SFCA 0.2 µm) before entering the vessel, and was fed into the mineral medium by means of a submerged silicone tube (internal diameter 2.8 mm, 0.8 mm thick, approximately 0.75 m length).
Q9. What was the rate of dechlorination observed during the first phase of the biofilm?
During the first phase, when 4-CP was fed at the highest concentration of 50 mg l–1, the rate of dechlorination was relatively high from day 14 to 51, for which period the highest removal capacity was observed.
Q10. What was the only source of carbon used by the enriched consortium?
As confirmed by the degradation tests made using the GAC bacterial extracts, 4-CP was used as a sole source of carbon by the enriched consortium, thus the addition of phenol was stopped.
Q11. What is the main reason why biofilms are subjected to interactions?
Biofilms are always subjected to interactions such as symbiosis, or competition for space, or common substrates, thus it is not surprising that dynamic changes of biofilm populations occur in these systems.
Q12. What is the reason for the biofilm to remain able to degrade?
The fact that the biofilm remainedcapable of 4-CP degradation suggests that biofilms are able to maintain active populations of competent microbial strains, even when the specific feedstock is intermittently removed.
Q13. How long did the column remain in the recirculating mode?
After that period the column was operated again under a recirculating regime (9 days), during which the column was fed with 2 l of minimal salts medium supplemented with 4-CP (50 mg l–1, on days 0 and 4), with an HRT of 17 min.
Q14. What was the morphological type of bacteria recovered in the continuous flow?
Visual observation of the bacterial populations recovered in the effluent during the first 30 days of continuous operation showed mainly four morphologically different colonial types, with a predominance (65–90%) of a morphological type similar to the one identified as A. radiobacter in the initial GAC extracts.
Q15. What was the morphologically different colonial type recovered on NA medium?
The isolation of the morphologically different colonial types recovered on that medium and identification by API revealed the presence of two different bacteria: Burkholderia cepacia (identification probability: 99.5%) and Agrobacterium radiobacter (identification probability: 95.7%), which was also recovered on NA medium.
Q16. What is the reason why the biofilm was able to survive a starvation period?
The 4-CP degrading biofilm consortium was capable of surviving a starvation period of at least 5 months, a result that reinforces the stability claimed for this kind of biotreatment system.
Q17. What was the effect of the suspension of the feed on the biofilm community?
Chloride release continued during this period of suspended feeding,a result indicating that 4-CP adsorbed to the GAC could be assimilated by the biofilm community.
Q18. What are the advantages of granular activated carbon (GAC) biofilm reactors?
Granular activated carbon (GAC) biofilm reactors can combine these two features; the adsorptive capacity and irregular shape of GAC particles provide niches for bacterial colonization protected from high fluid forces (Christensen and Characklis 1990), while the variety of functional groups on the surface can enhance the attachment of microorganisms (Weber et al. 1979).
Q19. How did Caldeira and his team determine the reliability of the biofilm reactor?
The present report extends their previous research on GAC biofilms (Caldeira et al. 1999) by evaluating 4-CP removal in a continuous flow bioreactor, in order to determine whether steady-state conditions could be achieved, and by analysing the robustness of the system to withstand long periods of contaminant starvation.
Q20. How did the performance of the reactor recover after these conditions?
The performance of their reactor recovered after these situations, especially when the 4-CP concentration was lowered to 20 mg l–1.
Q21. How many organisms were able to degrade 4-CP in a mono-species?
Only one organism, identified by the API 20 NE system with low discrimination between Chryseomonas luteola, B. cepacia or Sphingomonas paucimobilis, was capable of degrading 4-CP in a mono-species culture at 4-CP concentrations of 25 and 50 mg l–1.