scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A network theory of mental disorders.

Denny Borsboom
- 01 Feb 2017 - 
- Vol. 16, Iss: 1, pp 5-13
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The network theory has direct implications for how to understand diagnosis and treatment, and suggests a clear agenda for future research in psychiatry and associated disciplines.
About
This article is published in World Psychiatry.The article was published on 2017-02-01 and is currently open access. It has received 1311 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Mind-blindness & Psychological intervention.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Tutorial on Regularized Partial Correlation Networks

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe how regularization techniques can be used to efficiently estimate a parsimonious and interpretable network structure in psychological data, and demonstrate the method in an empirical example on post-traumatic stress disorder data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Moving Forward: Challenges and Directions for Psychopathological Network Theory and Methodology:

TL;DR: Challenges to network theory may propel the network approach from its adolescence into adulthood and promises advances in understanding psychopathology both at the nomothetic and idiographic level.
Journal ArticleDOI

A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks.

TL;DR: This tutorial introduces the reader to estimating the most popular network model for psychological data: the partial correlation network and describes how regularization techniques can be used to efficiently estimate a parsimonious and interpretable network structure in psychological data.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Do Centrality Measures Measure in Psychological Networks

TL;DR: Critically examine several issues with the use of the most popular centrality indices in psychological networks: degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality, and conclude that betweenness and closness centrality seem especially unsuitable as measures of node importance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bridge Centrality: A Network Approach to Understanding Comorbidity.

TL;DR: Four network statistics to identify bridge symptoms are developed: bridge strength, bridge betweenness, bridge closeness, and bridge expected influence, which are nonspecific to the type of network estimated, making them potentially useful in individual-level psychometric networks, group-level psychology networks, and networks outside the field of psychopathology such as social networks.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The small world of psychopathology.

TL;DR: In the network model, mental disorders are inherently complex, which explains the limited successes of genetic, neuroscientific, and etiological approaches to unravel their causes.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new method for constructing networks from binary data

TL;DR: A method for assessing network structures from binary data based on Ising models, which combines logistic regression with model selection based on a Goodness-of-Fit measure to identify relevant relationships between variables that define connections in a network is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders

TL;DR: It is argued that psychiatric disorders are objectively grounded features of the causal structure of the mind/brain and a model first proposed for biological species, mechanistic property cluster (MPC) kinds, can provide a useful framework.
Journal ArticleDOI

What are 'good' depression symptoms? Comparing the centrality of DSM and non-DSM symptoms of depression in a network analysis

TL;DR: The network perspective neither supports the standard psychometric notion that depression symptoms are equivalent indicators of MD, nor the common assumption that DSM symptoms of depression are of higher clinical relevance than non-DSM depression symptoms, which suggest the value of research focusing on especially central symptoms to increase the accuracy of predicting outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems

TL;DR: The author concludes that the Psychometric analysis of diagnostic systems is not settled, and that these systems require deeper psychometric analysis than they currently receive.
Related Papers (5)