scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring?

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
An integrative theoretical framework is suggested that incorporates the tools that were developed to overcome similar methodological problems in psychology to facilitate a robust and unified approach in the study of animal personality.
Abstract
The discovery that an individual may be constrained, and even behave sub-optimally, because of its personality type has fundamental implications for understanding individual- to group-level processes. Despite recent interest in the study of animal personalities within behavioural ecology, the field is fraught with conceptual and methodological difficulties inherent in any young discipline. We review the current agreement of definitions and methods used in personality studies across taxa and systems, and find that current methods risk misclassifying traits. Fortunately, these problems have been faced before by other similar fields during their infancy, affording important opportunities to learn from past mistakes. We review the tools that were developed to overcome similar methodological problems in psychology. These tools emphasise the importance of attempting to measure animal personality traits using multiple tests and the care that needs to be taken when interpreting correlations between personality traits or their tests. Accordingly, we suggest an integrative theoretical framework that incorporates these tools to facilitate a robust and unified approach in the study of animal personality.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

ORE Open Research Exeter
TITLE
Animal personality: What are behavioural ecologists measuring?
AUTHORS
Carter, Alecia J.; Feeney, WE; Marshall, Harry H.; et al.
JOURNAL
Biological Reviews
DEPOSITED IN ORE
04 January 2016
This version available at
http://hdl.handle.net/10871/19094
COPYRIGHT AND REUSE
Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies.
A NOTE ON VERSIONS
The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of
publication

For Review Only
Animal personality: wh
at are behavioural ecologists
measuring?
Journal:
Biological Reviews
Manuscript ID:
BRV-03-2012-0048.R2
Manuscript Type:
Original Article
Date Submitted by the Author:
n/a
Complete List of Authors:
Carter, Alecia; Australian National University, Fenner School of
Environment and Society
Feeney, William; Australian National University,
Marshall, Harry; Institute of Zoology,
Cowlishaw, Guy; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London
Heinsohn, Robert; Australian National University, Fenner School of
Environment and Society
Keywords:
behavioural syndromes, boldness, exploration, methodology, animal
personality, risk-taking
Biological Reviews

For Review Only
1
Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists
1
measuring?
2
3
Alecia J. Carter
1,2,3
, William E. Feeney
4
, Harry H. Marshall
2,5
, Guy Cowlishaw
2
& Robert
4
Heinsohn
1
5
6
7
1
The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, 8
Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia 9
2
The Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, NW1 4RY, London, U.K. 10
3
Current address: Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, The University of 11
Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 3EJ E 12
4
Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, The Research School of Biology, The Australian National 13
University, Acton, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia 14
5
Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood 15
Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, U.K. 16
Corresponding author: Alecia J. Carter: Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, The 17
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 3EJ E: ac854@cam.ac.uk T: +44 1223 769277 18
19
Page 1 of 33 Biological Reviews
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
2
Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring?
20
The discovery that an individual may be constrained, and even behave sub-optimally, because of its 21
personality type has fundamental implications for understanding individual- to group-level processes. 22
Despite recent interest in the study of animal personalities within behavioural ecology, the field is 23
fraught with conceptual and methodological difficulties inherent in any young discipline. We review 24
the current agreement of definitions and methods used in personality studies across taxa and systems, 25
and find that current methods risk misclassifying traits. Fortunately, these problems have been faced 26
before by other similar fields during their infancy, affording important opportunities to learn from past 27
mistakes. We review the tools that were developed to overcome similar methodological problems in 28
psychology. These tools emphasise the importance of attempting to measure animal personality traits 29
using multiple tests and the care that needs to be taken when interpreting correlations between 30
personality traits or their tests. Accordingly, we suggest an integrative theoretical framework that 31
incorporates these tools to facilitate a robust and unified approach in the study of animal personality. 32
33
Keywords: animal personality, behavioural syndromes, boldness, exploration, methods, risk-taking 34
35
Page 2 of 33Biological Reviews
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
3
CONTENTS 36
I. Introduction 37
II. Problems measuring personality traits 38
1. Many tests for one trait 39
2. One test for many traits 40
III. Lessons from other fields 41
1. An important caveat 42
2. Test validity 43
a. Reliability 44
b. Convergent and discriminant validities 45
c. Other validities 46
3. Jingle-jangle fallacies and trait definitions 47
4. Interpreting tests 48
5. Measurement considerations 49
IV. How to measure personality traits 50
V. Conclusions 51
52
Page 3 of 33 Biological Reviews
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The covariance between metabolic rate and behaviour varies across behaviours and thermal types: meta-analytic insights

TL;DR: It is found that behaviours with putatively weak or inconsistent consequences for net energy gain or expenditure show no relationship with maintenance metabolic rate, which suggests that the performance model may be the most common model in general.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex-Differences and Temporal Consistency in Stickleback Fish Boldness

TL;DR: Test the hypothesis that male three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) show high risk but potentially high return behaviours compared to females, and predicted that male fish would show greater exploration of their environment in a foraging context, and be caught sooner by an experimenter than females.
Journal ArticleDOI

Common marmosets show social plasticity and group-level similarity in personality

TL;DR: It is hypothesize that ‘group-personality’ may be adaptive for highly cooperative animals through facilitating cooperation among individuals with similar behavioural tendency through facilitated cooperation amongindividuals withsimilar behavioural tendency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do opposites attract? Effects of personality matching in breeding pairs of captive giant pandas on reproductive success

TL;DR: These findings indicate that specific combinations of personality traits showed better reproductive performance than others, and highlight the potential importance of associative mating patterns based on personality for conservation breeding programs for a large number of other species.
Journal ArticleDOI

Models of pace-of-life syndromes (POLS): a systematic review

TL;DR: It is found that the set of relevant models is small, and models show that covariances between life history traits and behavioural or physiological traits can arise even in the absence of a current-future reproduction trade-off, implying that observing such covariance does not provide a strong indication regarding the process generating POLS.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

TL;DR: This transmutability of the validation matrix argues for the comparisons within the heteromethod block as the most generally relevant validation data, and illustrates the potential interchangeability of trait and method components.
Journal ArticleDOI

Construct validity in psychological tests.

TL;DR: The present interpretation of construct validity is not "official" and deals with some areas where the Committee would probably not be unanimous, but the present writers are solely responsible for this attempt to explain the concept and elaborate its implications.
Book

Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a taxonomy of the Big Five Trait Taxonomy of personality traits and its relationship with the human brain. But the taxonomy does not consider the relationship between the brain and the human personality.
Journal ArticleDOI

The development of markers for the big-five factor structure

TL;DR: In this paper, a set of 100 unipolar terms for personality traits was developed and compared with previously developed ones based on far larger sets of trait adjectives, as well as with the scales from the NEO and Hogan personality inventories.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits

TL;DR: This personal historical article traces the development of the Big-Five factor structure, whose growing acceptance by personality researchers has profoundly influenced the scientific study of individual differences.
Related Papers (5)