scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring?

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
An integrative theoretical framework is suggested that incorporates the tools that were developed to overcome similar methodological problems in psychology to facilitate a robust and unified approach in the study of animal personality.
Abstract
The discovery that an individual may be constrained, and even behave sub-optimally, because of its personality type has fundamental implications for understanding individual- to group-level processes. Despite recent interest in the study of animal personalities within behavioural ecology, the field is fraught with conceptual and methodological difficulties inherent in any young discipline. We review the current agreement of definitions and methods used in personality studies across taxa and systems, and find that current methods risk misclassifying traits. Fortunately, these problems have been faced before by other similar fields during their infancy, affording important opportunities to learn from past mistakes. We review the tools that were developed to overcome similar methodological problems in psychology. These tools emphasise the importance of attempting to measure animal personality traits using multiple tests and the care that needs to be taken when interpreting correlations between personality traits or their tests. Accordingly, we suggest an integrative theoretical framework that incorporates these tools to facilitate a robust and unified approach in the study of animal personality.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

ORE Open Research Exeter
TITLE
Animal personality: What are behavioural ecologists measuring?
AUTHORS
Carter, Alecia J.; Feeney, WE; Marshall, Harry H.; et al.
JOURNAL
Biological Reviews
DEPOSITED IN ORE
04 January 2016
This version available at
http://hdl.handle.net/10871/19094
COPYRIGHT AND REUSE
Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies.
A NOTE ON VERSIONS
The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of
publication

For Review Only
Animal personality: wh
at are behavioural ecologists
measuring?
Journal:
Biological Reviews
Manuscript ID:
BRV-03-2012-0048.R2
Manuscript Type:
Original Article
Date Submitted by the Author:
n/a
Complete List of Authors:
Carter, Alecia; Australian National University, Fenner School of
Environment and Society
Feeney, William; Australian National University,
Marshall, Harry; Institute of Zoology,
Cowlishaw, Guy; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London
Heinsohn, Robert; Australian National University, Fenner School of
Environment and Society
Keywords:
behavioural syndromes, boldness, exploration, methodology, animal
personality, risk-taking
Biological Reviews

For Review Only
1
Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists
1
measuring?
2
3
Alecia J. Carter
1,2,3
, William E. Feeney
4
, Harry H. Marshall
2,5
, Guy Cowlishaw
2
& Robert
4
Heinsohn
1
5
6
7
1
The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, 8
Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia 9
2
The Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, NW1 4RY, London, U.K. 10
3
Current address: Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, The University of 11
Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 3EJ E 12
4
Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, The Research School of Biology, The Australian National 13
University, Acton, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia 14
5
Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood 15
Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, U.K. 16
Corresponding author: Alecia J. Carter: Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, The 17
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB2 3EJ E: ac854@cam.ac.uk T: +44 1223 769277 18
19
Page 1 of 33 Biological Reviews
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
2
Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring?
20
The discovery that an individual may be constrained, and even behave sub-optimally, because of its 21
personality type has fundamental implications for understanding individual- to group-level processes. 22
Despite recent interest in the study of animal personalities within behavioural ecology, the field is 23
fraught with conceptual and methodological difficulties inherent in any young discipline. We review 24
the current agreement of definitions and methods used in personality studies across taxa and systems, 25
and find that current methods risk misclassifying traits. Fortunately, these problems have been faced 26
before by other similar fields during their infancy, affording important opportunities to learn from past 27
mistakes. We review the tools that were developed to overcome similar methodological problems in 28
psychology. These tools emphasise the importance of attempting to measure animal personality traits 29
using multiple tests and the care that needs to be taken when interpreting correlations between 30
personality traits or their tests. Accordingly, we suggest an integrative theoretical framework that 31
incorporates these tools to facilitate a robust and unified approach in the study of animal personality. 32
33
Keywords: animal personality, behavioural syndromes, boldness, exploration, methods, risk-taking 34
35
Page 2 of 33Biological Reviews
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
3
CONTENTS 36
I. Introduction 37
II. Problems measuring personality traits 38
1. Many tests for one trait 39
2. One test for many traits 40
III. Lessons from other fields 41
1. An important caveat 42
2. Test validity 43
a. Reliability 44
b. Convergent and discriminant validities 45
c. Other validities 46
3. Jingle-jangle fallacies and trait definitions 47
4. Interpreting tests 48
5. Measurement considerations 49
IV. How to measure personality traits 50
V. Conclusions 51
52
Page 3 of 33 Biological Reviews
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Body length rather than routine metabolic rate and body condition correlates with activity and risk-taking in juvenile zebrafish Danio rerio.

TL;DR: It is suggested that body length is associated with risk‐related behaviours in juvenile D. rerio for which larger, rather than smaller, individuals may have a higher risk of predation, while the role for routine metabolic rate is relatively limited or non‐existent, at least under the conditions of the present study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Can personality predict individual differences in brook trout spatial learning ability

TL;DR: The learning rate of bold fish was found to be lower than that of shy fish for several metrics suggesting that personality could have widespread effects on behaviour, and these results have significant implications for fish conservation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Urbanization and individual differences in exploration and plasticity

TL;DR: It is suggested, for the first time, that individuals from urban and non-urban habitats differ in the amount of among-individual variation in exploration, and thus urban individuals may benefit from diverging more from one another in their behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI

Personality does not predict social dominance in wild groups of black-capped chickadees

TL;DR: This paper investigated the relationship between three personality traits hypothesized to be linked to the proactive-reactive axis (i.e., exploration, activity and object neophilia) and dominance in wild groups of black-capped chickadees, a resident passerine bird that overwinters in flocks characterized by linear dominance hierarchies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Personality affects mate choice: bolder males show stronger audience effects under high competition

TL;DR: This study exemplifies that (depending on the social context) bolder, not shyer, individuals can be more responsive to their social environment.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

TL;DR: This transmutability of the validation matrix argues for the comparisons within the heteromethod block as the most generally relevant validation data, and illustrates the potential interchangeability of trait and method components.
Journal ArticleDOI

Construct validity in psychological tests.

TL;DR: The present interpretation of construct validity is not "official" and deals with some areas where the Committee would probably not be unanimous, but the present writers are solely responsible for this attempt to explain the concept and elaborate its implications.
Book

Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a taxonomy of the Big Five Trait Taxonomy of personality traits and its relationship with the human brain. But the taxonomy does not consider the relationship between the brain and the human personality.
Journal ArticleDOI

The development of markers for the big-five factor structure

TL;DR: In this paper, a set of 100 unipolar terms for personality traits was developed and compared with previously developed ones based on far larger sets of trait adjectives, as well as with the scales from the NEO and Hogan personality inventories.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits

TL;DR: This personal historical article traces the development of the Big-Five factor structure, whose growing acceptance by personality researchers has profoundly influenced the scientific study of individual differences.
Related Papers (5)