scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Areas of conflict for gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples: What couples argue about influences relationship satisfaction.

Lawrence A. Kurdek
- 01 Nov 1994 - 
- Vol. 56, Iss: 4, pp 923-934
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors focus on identifying the substantive areas in which couples experience conflict and examine whether the frequency of conflict in various content areas is differentially related to relationship satisfaction.
Abstract
Although conflict is an ubiquitous aspect of any close relationship, researchers have paid more attention to how conflict gets resolved (e.g., Gottman, 1994; Heavey, Layne, & Christensen, 1993; Markman, Renick, Floyd, & Stanley, 1993) than to what couples fight about. To redress this imbalance, the focus of the current paper is on identifying the substantive areas in which couples experience conflict and examining whether the frequency of conflict in various content areas is differentially related to relationship satisfaction. Although the eventual research goal is to study how relationship well-being is affected by interactions between the content of what couples argue about and the manner in which couples manage and resolve conflict, the more modest goal of this study was to attend to the link between the content of couple conflict and relationship satisfaction.The conceptual framework used to examine the link between the content of couple conflict and relationship satisfaction was interdependence theory (Kelley & Thibaut, 1978). In this theory, the nature of the interaction between partners is the essence of a close relationship and is viewed in terms of degree of interdependence, that is, the extent to which each partner influences the other partner's positive and negative outcomes derived from the relationship. Generally, a person is satisfied with the relationship to the extent that perceived rewards from the relationship are high, perceived costs to being in the relationship are low, and the relationship is seen as meeting an internalized standard of what a good relationship should be (Rusbult, 1983).Within interdependence theory, frequent conflict between partners generally has been viewed as a cost to being in the relationship (e.g., Duffy & Rusbult, 1986). Indeed, frequency of interpartner conflict consistently has been found to be negatively related to appraisals of relationship satisfaction (e.g., Kurdek, 1991a, 1991b). However, the key issue of concern here is whether interpartner conflict over some areas is more strongly related to relationship satisfaction than is conflict over other areas. Based on interdependence theory (Braiker & Kelley, 1979), one would expect that interpartner conflict in areas that reflect high levels of interdependence would be especially strongly linked to relationship satisfaction because such conflict would directly affect perceived outcomes from the relationship.Surprisingly, few studies have addressed the relation between frequency of relationship conflict in specific content areas and relationship satisfaction. Storaasli and Markman (1990), as part of a larger study, correlated 40 spouses' ratings of the intensity of conflict in 10 problem areas (money, communication, relatives, sex, religion, recreation, friends, alcohol/drugs, children, and jealousy) with their marital adjustment. Spouses were married for about 1 year and did not have children living with them. A key finding from this study was that the relation between marital adjustment and intensity of conflict varied by problem area. In particular, husbands' marital adjustment was most strongly negatively associated with the intensity of conflict over communication and sex. Wives' marital adjustment was most strongly negatively associated with the intensity of conflict over communication and sex as well as over relatives and jealousy.In a study of 168 couples over the first 2 years of marriage, Vangelisti and Huston (1994) related each spouse's satisfaction with eight domains of marriage (communication, influence on making joint decisions, sex, leisure activities, division of household tasks, time together, time with friends/relatives, and finances) to marital satisfaction. Couples were studied shortly after their marriage and then again after their first and second wedding anniversaries. About half of the couples had children at the last assessment. As in the Storaasli and Markman (1990) study, the relation between satisfaction with domains of the marriage and marital satisfaction varied by domains. …

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Victimization over the life span: a comparison of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual siblings.

TL;DR: Lifetime victimization was examined in a primarily European American sample that comprised 557 lesbian/gay, 163 bisexual, and 525 heterosexual adults, and sexual orientation differences in sexual victimization were greater among men than among women.
Journal ArticleDOI

CONFLICT IN MARRIAGE: Implications for Working with Couples

TL;DR: This chapter reviews briefly the impact of marital conflict on mental, physical, and family health and what is known about the nature of conflict in marriage and illustrates how conceptualizing marital conflict behavior as goal directed provides an integrative theoretical framework for treatment, prevention, and marital conflict research.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Close Relationships of Lesbians and Gay Men

TL;DR: Empirical studies of same-sex couples in the United States are reviewed, highlighting consistent findings, drawing comparisons to heterosexual couples, and noting gaps in available research.
Book

Lesbian and Gay Parents and Their Children: Research on the Family Life Cycle

TL;DR: The authors provides a comprehensive overview of the research on same-sex parenthood, exploring ways in which lesbian and gay parents resist, accommodate, and transform fundamental notions of gender, parenting, and family.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stress and relationship quality in same-sex couples

TL;DR: The authors examined actor-partner effects of internalized homophobia, discrimination, and perceived stress on perceptions of relationship quality in same-sex couples, and found that higher levels of perceived discrimination and/or victimization were predictive of less favorable perceptions about relationship quality.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Development (and Deterioration) of Satisfaction and Commitment in Heterosexual Involvements

TL;DR: In this article, a longitudinal study of heterosexual dating relationships tested investment model predictions regarding the process by which satisfaction and commitment develop (or deteriorate) over time, whereas variations in costs did not significantly affect satisfaction.
BookDOI

What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes.

TL;DR: In this paper, Terman's Question: What Makes for Marital Happiness? The View From Observational Methods was raised from observations from physiological and behavioral methods, and a balance theory of marriage was proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale.

TL;DR: The KMS scale was found to correlate substantially with both Spanier's (1976) Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and Norton's (1983) Quality Marriage Index (QMI), but not to correlate significantly more than those two scales with a variety of other satisfaction items designed to assess the discriminant validity of the KMS Scale as discussed by the authors.
Related Papers (5)