Book ChapterDOI
Aristotle's Logic and Theory of Science
Wolfgang Detel
- pp 245-269
Reads0
Chats0
About:
The article was published on 2012-05-08. It has received 5 citations till now.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Doing what's right: A grounded theory of ethical decision-making in occupational therapy.
TL;DR: An ethical decision-making prism was developed to capture three main processes: Considering the Fundamental Checklist, Consulting Others, and Doing What’s Right and appeared to be an inductive and dialectical process with the occupational therapist at its core.
Journal ArticleDOI
Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics i.33)
TL;DR: Aristotle contrasts episteme and doxa through the key notions of universal and necessary as mentioned in this paper, which have played a central role in Aristotle's characterization of scientific knowledge in the previous chapters of APo.33.
Journal ArticleDOI
Claves para una lectura alternativa de la axiomática en Aristóteles. El caso de Acerca del cielo I
TL;DR: In this article, el conocimiento de los principios se reduce a una captación intelectual directa, i.e., a conjunto de proposiciones basicas, a partir del cual se infiere un conjounto numericamente mucho larger de propositions derivadas.
Journal ArticleDOI
La demostración por la causa eficiente en Sobre la generación y la corrupción 2. 10 de Aristóteles
TL;DR: The authors Reconstruiremos un pasaje puntual de GC 2. 10 para defender la hipotesis del uso real de la demostracion cientifica en los tratados científicos.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Studies in the Logic of Explanation
Carl G. Hempel,Paul Oppenheim +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, an elementary survey of the basic pattern of scientific explanation and a subsequent more rigorous analysis of the concept of law and of the logical structure of explanatory arguments are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
What is a syllogism
TL;DR: If Eukasiewicz's treatment is to accommodate Aristotle’s distinction, he must both show that the distinction makes sense when interpreted as applying to conditionals and that this sense is such as to establish some connection between ostensive and per impossibile conditionals.
Book ChapterDOI
Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality
TL;DR: Aristotle's teleology is a central component of his philosophy, and interpretations of it often heavily influence evaluations of the significance of his thought, both in science and in philosophy.