scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Big Data: The End of Privacy or a New Beginning?

Ira Rubinstein
- 01 May 2013 - 
- Vol. 3, Iss: 2, pp 74-87
TLDR
In this paper, the authors argue that this Regulation, in seeking to remedy some longstanding deficiencies with the DPD as well as more recent issues associated with targeting, profiling, and consumer mistrust, relies too heavily on the discredited informed choice model, and therefore fails to fully engage with the impending Big Data tsunami.
Abstract
‘Big Data’ refers to novel ways in which organizations, including government and businesses, combine diverse digital datasets and then use statistics and other data mining techniques to extract from them both hidden information and surprising correlations. While Big Data promises significant economic and social benefits, it also raises serious privacy concerns. In particular, Big Data challenges the Fair Information Practices (FIPs), which form the basis of all modern privacy law. Probably the most influential privacy law in the world today is the European Union Data Protection Directive 95/46 EC (DPD). 1 In January 2012, the European Commission (EC) released a proposal to reform and replace the DPD by adopting a new Regulation. 2 In what follows, I argue that this Regulation, in seeking to remedy some longstanding deficiencies with the DPD as well as more recent issues associated with targeting, profiling, and consumer mistrust, relies too heavily on the discredited informed choice model, and therefore fails to fully engage with the impending Big Data tsunami. My contention is that when this advancing wave arrives, it will so overwhelm the core privacy principles of informed choice and data minimization on which the DPD rests that reform efforts will not be enough. Rather, an adequate response must combine legal reform with the encouragement of new business models premised on consumer empowerment and supported by a personal data ecosystem. This new business model is important for two reasons: First, existing business models have proven time and again that privacy regulation is no match for them. Businesses inevitably collect and use more and more personal data, and while consumers realize many benefits in exchange, there is little doubt that businesses, not consumers, control the market in personal data with their own interests in mind. Second, a new business model, which I describe below, promises to stand processing of personal data on its head by shifting control over both the collection and use of data from firms to individuals. This new business model arguably stands a chance of making the FIPs efficacious by giving individuals the capacity to benefit from Big Data and hence the motivation to learn about and control how their data are collected and used. It could also enable businesses to profit from a new breed of services

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions

TL;DR: This paper presents a review of the Internet-of-Things through four conceptualizations: IoT as liquification and density of information of resources; IoT as digital materiality%; IoT as assemblage or service system; and IoT as modules, transactions, and service.
Journal ArticleDOI

Big Data: Survey, Technologies, Opportunities, and Challenges

TL;DR: This study comprehensively surveys and classifies the various attributes of Big data, including its nature, definitions, rapid growth rate, volume, management, analysis, and security, and proposes a data life cycle that uses the technologies and terminologies of Big Data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Security, privacy and trust of different layers in Internet-of-Things (IoTs) framework

TL;DR: This paper compares security issues between IoT and traditional network, and discusses opening security issues of IoT, and analyzes the cross-layer heterogeneous integration issues and security issues in detail.
Journal ArticleDOI

The ethics of smart cities and urban science

TL;DR: It is argued that smart city initiatives and urban science need to be re-cast in three ways: a re-orientation in how cities are conceived; a reconfiguring of the underlying epistemology to openly recognize the contingent and relational nature of urban systems, processes and science; and the adoption of ethical principles designed to realize benefits of smart cities and urbanScience while reducing pernicious effects.
Book ChapterDOI

Big data’s end run around anonymity and consent

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on attempts to avoid or mitigate the conflicts that may arise, taking as a given that big data implicates important ethical and political values, and they do so because the familiar pair of anonymity and informed consent continues to strike many as the best and perhaps only way to escape the need to actually resolve these conflicts one way or the other.