scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Comparative Study of Methods for Analysis of Laterally Loaded Well Foundation

Ramyasri Rachamadugu, +1 more
- Vol. 84, pp 385-398
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A comparative study of the available methods of analysis of laterally loaded well foundation is presented in this article, which highlights the need for proper evaluation of available methods with realistic incorporation of foundation stiffness and interface effect in modeling the Well-Soil system for pseudo static loading conditions.
Abstract
Well foundation is commonly used in India for road and railway bridges over rivers. It is a massive structure and hence it is generally considered to be safe under laterally loaded condition. Indian Roads Congress Codes (IRC:45-1972 and IRC:78-1983) suggests limit equilibrium approach to determine lateral load capacity of well foundation. It considers well foundation as a rigid body and surrounding soils as elastic in design state and plastic in limit state. Design procedure stated in Indian standard codes determines ultimate lateral load capacity of Well-Soil system. However, it does not yield the magnitude of lateral displacement of a well foundation at the ultimate load. Because of this, it is difficult to decide whether the lateral displacement at estimated ultimate lateral load capacity of a well foundation is allowable or not. Over the years, few methods to analyze the lateral response (both force and displacement responses) of well foundation are developed. These methods consider surrounding soil as linear elastic material which is modeled by linear elastic springs, and well foundation as a rigid body. Recently developed methods consider lateral stiffness as well as rotational stiffness of the surrounding soil and represent soil by parallel combination of lateral linear springs and rotational springs. Some of these methods also consider flexibility of well foundation and model well foundation by Euler-Bernoulli beam element. In this article, we present a comparative study of the available methods of analysis of laterally loaded well foundation. This study indicates significant differences in the response of Well-Soil system obtained from different methods. Validation of existing methods is done with two-dimensional continuum model to identify accuracy in existing models. It highlights the need for proper evaluation of available methods of analysis with realistic incorporation of foundation stiffness and interface effect in modeling the Well-Soil system for pseudo static loading conditions.

read more

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Seismic Response of Bridge Pier on Rigid Caisson Foundation in Soil Stratum

TL;DR: In this paper, an analytical method to study the seismic response of a bridge pier supported on a rigid caisson foundation embedded in a deep soil stratum underlain by a homogeneous half space is developed.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the seismic response of under-designed caisson foundations

TL;DR: In this article, the seismic behavior of caisson foundations supporting typical bridge piers is analyzed with 3D finite elements, with due consideration to soil and interface nonlinearities, using single-degree-of-freedom oscillators of varying mass and height.
Journal ArticleDOI

Testing and analysis of a laterally loaded bridge caisson foundation in gravel

TL;DR: In this paper, the results of an in situ lateral load test on a caisson-type foundation of the old Niu-Dou Bridge in Ilan County, Taiwan were presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a seismic capacity design of caisson foundations supporting bridge piers

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the nonlinear response under lateral monotonic and slow-cyclic loading of caisson foundations supporting bridge piers in cohesive soils, and showed that all loadpaths display certain characteristics, such as a particular "overstrength" in bearing capacity that is mobilized by the foundation, irrespective of the stiffness properties and constraints at the superstructure system.
Journal ArticleDOI

Simplified seismic analysis of soil–well–pier system for bridges

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used three different approaches to evaluate their comparative performance and associated complexities: two-dimensional nonlinear (2D-NL), 2D-EqL, and one-dimensional spring-dashpot (1D).