scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Crowdfunding creative ideas: the dynamics of project backers in kickstarter

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article studied the role of social information in the dynamic behavior of project backers and found that additional backer support is negatively related to its past backer support, while the diffusion of responsibility effects diminish as the project funding cycle approaches its closing date.
Abstract
Entrepreneurs are turning to crowdfunding as a way to finance their creative ideas. Crowdfunding involves relatively small contributions of many consumer-investors over a fixed time limit (generally a few weeks). In online crowdfunding communities, potential donors can see the level of support from other project backers as well as its timing before making their own funding decisions, suggesting that social information (i.e., others’ funding decisions) will play an important role in the ultimate success of a project. Two years of publicly available panel data on successfully and unsuccessfully funded projects listed on Kickstarter is used to empirically study the role of social information in the dynamic behavior of project backers. Building off the well-established social psychology theory around diffusion of responsibility effects, we show that additional backer support is negatively related to its past backer support. Many potential backers do not contribute to a project that has already received a lot of support because they assume that others will provide the necessary funding. Consistent with the deadline effect widely observed in bargaining and online auctions, we also show that the diffusion of responsibility effects diminish as the project funding cycle approaches its closing date. Moreover, as the project deadline draws near we find that project updates tend to increase as the project creators make a final plea for help to reach their funding goal. Reduced diffusion of responsibility effects, together with the positive influence of project updates, lead to generally increasing project support in the final stages of funding. This is particularly the case for projects that successfully achieve their goals as they are more likely to have an update in the last weeks of funding and generate more excitement from recent backers than projects that fall short.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the internal social capital that proponents may develop inside the crowdfunding community provides crucial assistance in igniting a self-reinforcing mechanism, and they show that the effect of these internal social networks on the success of a campaign is fully mediated by the capital and backers collected in the campaign's early days.
Posted Content

The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention

TL;DR: The goal-gradient hypothesis as discussed by the authors states that humans expend more effort as they approach a reward and the illusion of progress toward the goal induces purchase acceleration, which predicts greater retention and faster reengagement in the program.
Journal ArticleDOI

Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success:

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on information economics to examine when signals and endorsements obtained from multiple information sources enhance or diminish one another's effects, and propose that signals from different information sources can have different effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs

TL;DR: In this article, the importance of linguistic style depends on whether an entrepreneur belongs to an emergent category of new ventures (social entrepreneurs) or to an established category (commercial entrepreneurs) and how such a style relates to the success in raising funds.
Journal ArticleDOI

Wisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in Funding the Arts

TL;DR: It is suggested that crowdfunding can play an important role in complementing expert decisions, particularly in sectors where the crowds are end users, by allowing projects the option to receive multiple evaluations and thereby lowering the incidence of "false negatives."
References
More filters
Book

Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data

TL;DR: This is the essential companion to Jeffrey Wooldridge's widely-used graduate text Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, 2001).
MonographDOI

Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications

TL;DR: This chapter discusses models for making pseudo-random draw, which combines asymptotic theory, Bayesian methods, and ML and NLS estimation with real-time data structures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching

TL;DR: Propensity score matching (PSM) has become a popular approach to estimate causal treatment effects as discussed by the authors, but empirical examples can be found in very diverse fields of study, and each implementation step involves a lot of decisions and different approaches can be thought of.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interaction terms in logit and probit models

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the correct way to estimate the magnitude and standard errors of the interaction effect in nonlinear models, which is the same way as in this paper.
Posted Content

A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades

TL;DR: It is argued that localized conformity of behavior and the fragility of mass behaviors can be explained by informational cascades.
Related Papers (5)