scispace - formally typeset
BookDOI

Democracy, accountability, and representation

TLDR
In this article, the authors examined whether the mechanisms of accountability characteristic of democratic systems are sufficient to induce the representatives to act in the best interest of the represented, and they concluded that economic development does not generate democracies, but democracies are much more likely to survive in wealthy societies.
Abstract
This book examines whether the mechanisms of accountability characteristic of democratic systems are sufficient to induce the representatives to act in the best interest of the represented. The first part of the volume focuses on the role of elections, distinguishing different ways in which they may cause representation. The second part is devoted to the role of checks and balances, between the government and the parliament as well as between the government and the bureaucracy. The contributors of this volume, all leading scholars in the fields of American and comparative politics and political theory, address questions such as, whether elections induce governments to act in the interest of citizens. Are politicians in democracies accountable to voters in future elections? If so, does accountability induce politicians to represent citizens? Does accountability limit or enhance the scope of action of governments? Are governments that violate campaign mandates representative? Overall, the essays combine theoretical discussions, game-theoretic models, case studies, and statistical analyses, within a shared analytical approach and a standardized terminology. The empirical material is drawn from the well established democracies as well as from new democracies. Is economic development conducive to political democracy? Does democracy foster or hinder material welfare? These two questions are examined by looking at the experiences of 135 countries between 1950 and 1990. Descriptive information, statistical analyses, and historical narratives are interwoven to gain an understanding of the dynamic of political regimes and their impact on economic development. The often surprising findings dispel any notion of a tradeoff between democracy and development. Economic development does not generate democracies, but democracies are much more likely to survive in wealthy societies.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework†

TL;DR: The concept of accountability is used in a rather narrow sense: a relationship between an actor and a forum, in which the actor has an obligation to explain and to justify his or her conduct, the forum can pose questions and pass judgement, and the actor may face consequences as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify seven types of accountability mechanisms and consider their applicability to states, NGOs, multilateral organizations, multinational corporations, and transgovernmental networks, and identify opportunities for improving protections against abuses of power at the global level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Accountability In Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs

TL;DR: In this article, five broad accountability mechanisms are reviewed: reports and disclosure statements, performance assessments and evaluations, participation, self-regulation, and social audits, and it is observed that accountability in practice has emphasized "upward" and "external" accountability to donors while ''downward'' and ''internal'' mechanisms remain comparatively underdeveloped.
Book

The Representative Claim

TL;DR: In this article, the idea of the representative claim is advanced and defended, and a new, broader and more complex picture of representation is sketched, which helps to reconnect representation theory to pressing real-world challenges.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil's Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the effect of the disclosure of local government corruption practices upon the re-election success of incumbent mayors in municipal elections and found that disclosure of audit results had a significant impact on the reelection rates of mayors found to be corrupt.