scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Divergence, Big Time

Lant Pritchett
- 01 Aug 1997 - 
- Vol. 11, Iss: 3, pp 1
TLDR
In the last century, incomes in the less developed countries have fallen far behind those in the "developed" countries, both proportionately and absolutely as discussed by the authors, and this divergence is the result of very different patterns in the long-run economic performance of two sets of countries.
Abstract
ivergence in relative productivity levels and living standards is the dominant feature of modern economic history. In the last century, incomes in the "less developed" (or euphemistically, the "developing") countries have fallen far behind those in the "developed" countries, both proportionately and absolutely. I estimate that from 1870 to 1990 the ratio of per capita incomes between the richest and the poorest countries increased by roughly a factor of five and that the difference in income between the richest country and all others has increased by an order of magnitude.' This divergence is the result of the very different patterns in the long-run economic performance of two sets of countries. One set of countries-call them the "developed" or the "advanced capitalist" (Maddison, 1995) or the "high income OECD" (World Bank, 1995) -is easily, if awkwardly, identified as European countries and their offshoots plus Japan. Since 1870, the long-run growth rates of these countries have been rapid (by previous historical standards), their growth rates have been remarkably similar, and the poorer members of the group grew sufficiently faster to produce considerable convergence in absolute income levels. The other set of countries, called the "developing" or "less developed" or "nonindustrialized," can be easily, if still awkwardly, defined only as "the other set of countries," as they have nothing else in common. The growth rates of this set of countries have been, on average, slower than the richer countries, producing divergence in ' To put it another way, the standard deviation of (natural log) GDP per capita across all countries has increased between 60 percent and 100 percent since 1870, in spite of the convergence amongst the richest.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
ReportDOI

Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution*

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the reversal in relative incomes of colonized countries during the past 500 years resulted from societies with good institutions taking advantage of the opportunity to industrialize.
Journal ArticleDOI

The New Growth Evidence

TL;DR: The authors surveys the recent empirical literature on economic growth, starting with a discussion of stylized facts, data problems, and statistical methods and concludes that efficiency has grown at different rates across countries, casting doubt on neoclassical models in which technology is a public good.
Journal ArticleDOI

The building blocks of economic complexity

TL;DR: It is shown that it is possible to quantify the complexity of a country's economy by characterizing the structure of this bipartite network in which countries are connected to the products they export, and that deviations from this relationship are predictive of future growth.
ReportDOI

Population, Technology, and Growth: From the Malthusian Regime to the Demographic Transition and Beyond

TL;DR: In this paper, a unified model of growth, population, and technological progress is developed, which is consistent with long-term historical evidence, and it is shown that technological progress creates a state of disequilibrium which raises the return to human capital and induces patients to substitute child quality for quantity.
Posted Content

Where Has All the Education Gone

TL;DR: Pritchett et al. as discussed by the authors found that education did not lead to faster economic growth and pointed out that increasing educational capital resulting from improvements in the educational attainment of the labor force has no positive impact on the growth rate of output per worker.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth

TL;DR: The authors examined whether the Solow growth model is consistent with the international variation in the standard of living, and they showed that an augmented Solow model that includes accumulation of human as well as physical capital provides an excellent description of the cross-country data.
ReportDOI

Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries

TL;DR: For 98 countries in the period 1960-1985, the growth rate of real per capita GDP is positively related to initial human capital (proxied by 1960 school-enrollment rates) and negatively related to the initial (1960) level as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

R&d-based models of economic growth

TL;DR: In this article, a modified version of the Romer model that is consistent with this evidence is proposed, but the extended model alters a key implication usually found in endogenous growth theory.
Posted Content

The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1987

TL;DR: The Penn World Table as discussed by the authors is a set of national accounts economic time series covering many countries and its expenditure entries are denominated in common set of prices in a common currency so that real quantity comparisons can be made, both between countries and over time.
Posted Content

Long Run Policy Analysis and Long Run Growth

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe a class of models in which this type of heterogeneity in growth experiences can arise as a result of cross-country differences in government policy, which can also create incentives for labor migration from slow growing to fast growing countries.