DVB-S2X-enabled precoding for high throughput satellite systems
read more
Citations
Symbol-Level and Multicast Precoding for Multiuser Multiantenna Downlink: A State-of-the-Art, Classification, and Challenges
Generalized Multicast Multibeam Precoding for Satellite Communications
Precoding in Multibeam Satellite Communications: Present and Future Challenges
Signal Processing for High Throughput Satellite Systems: Challenges in New Interference-Limited Scenarios
Generalized Multicast Multibeam Precoding for Satellite Communications
References
Writing on dirty paper (Corresp.)
On the optimality of multiantenna broadcast scheduling using zero-forcing beamforming
MIMO over Satellite: A Review
Generic Optimization of Linear Precoding in Multibeam Satellite Systems
Weighted Fair Multicast Multigroup Beamforming Under Per-antenna Power Constraints
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Dvb-s2x enabled precoding for high throughput satellite systems" ?
Further work is required to compare the performance of precoded networks with classical frequency reuse 4 systems at a given maximum power and payload mass.
Q3. How can a precoding system serve traffic?
The precoding system with ideal CSI is able to serve the traffic up to a rate of 120 Gbit/s before saturation effects start to appear and packet losses occur.
Q4. What is the impact of the frequency re-use of one?
due to the system moving from a conventional frequency re-use of four to a frequency re-use of one, a deterioration of the carrier-to-interference ratio (C/I) is inevitable, thus resulting in low SNIR levels that may not be supported by DVB-S2 ModCod options.
Q5. What are the main impairments of the composite received signal?
due to the characteristics of the receiver, the composite received signal is affected by the following common impairments which depend only on the considered UT: time and frequency drift, i.e., τdk, fdk, frequency offset fok, and phase noise φk[n].
Q6. What is the drawback of the Bundled PLFRAMES?
the drawback implied by the use of the relatively long Bundled PLFRAMES is represented by possible inefficiencies of the scheduler as well as potential increase of data delay jitter.
Q7. What effects are taken into account in the simulations?
Three effects are taken into account in the simulations: Limit on the channel estimation for the interfering signals Effect of outdated phase estimation due to the round trip time (RTT) Effect of the estimation errors of both amplitude and phase on the channel matrix for the mainsignal as well as for the interfering signalsLimitations on the channel estimation as well as residuals from the estimation procedure for both amplitude and phase related to each waveform (the reference and the interfering waveforms) have been obtained through physical layer simulations.
Q8. What is the way to keep the complexity of the simulations low?
For keeping the scheduling complexity low in the simulations, the number of users that are selected for one frame is fixed and set to a not-optimized value of N = 5, which however is indicative of a typical IP packet size compared to the size of the bundled PLFRAME.
Q9. Why do the UTs need to estimate channels under a higher interference environment?
These channel estimation operations take place under a higher interference environment (compared to the usual four colour systems) due to the more aggressive interference reuse, with the strongest interference approaching the same power as the main carrier and a number of additional non-negligible interferers.
Q10. What is the literature on satellite-based precoding?
the literature on satellite-based precoding assumes that all spot beams in the system are served by a single GW, which is not feasible due to the limited feeder link spectrum.
Q11. What is the reason for the phase variation in the fixed satellite channel?
The reason only the phase estimate variation is of concern is the slow varying nature of the fixed satellite channel amplitude when impaired by atmospheric effects.
Q12. How many sequences of symbols are used to fill the fields?
These fields are also conveniently filled by pre-defined sequences of symbols derived by a set of 256 and 32 Walsh-Hadamard sequences, respectively.
Q13. What is the effect of the phase variation due to the payload chains?
The effect of the phase variation due to the payload chains are due to the different LOs in charge of the uplink to downlink frequency conversion.
Q14. What is the impact of precoding on regional HTS systems?
This fact, the impact of which is quantified in Section VI, along with increase of the on board equipment when higher frequency re-use factors are considered, renders precoding much more suitable for regional HTS systems providing multibeam coverage through a moderate number of spot beams.
Q15. What is the effect of a single GW system on the feeder links?
The implementation of a single GW system, especially with a high number of beams and users, and thus a high capacity demand, puts high demands on the feeder links.
Q16. What is the problem with the CSI estimate?
This calls for a much more sophisticated UT synchronization and channel estimation approach that has been developed during the ESA NGW R&D activity [12] and is overviewed in Section V. Despite putting in place these mechanisms, the CSI estimate still contains residuals errors which reduce the expected gains of the technique.
Q17. What is the implication to the satellite payload in terms of frequency re-use factors?
The implication to the satellite payload in terms of number of High Power Amplifiers (HPA) might be significant for conventional Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier -based multi-beam systems.