scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002.

Paul F. Hogan, +2 more
- 01 Mar 2003 - 
- Vol. 26, Iss: 3, pp 917-932
TLDR
In this paper, the authors estimated the direct medical and indirect productivity-related costs attributable to diabetes and calculated and compared the total and per capita medical expenditures for people with and without diabetes.
Abstract
Objective Diabetes is the fifth leading cause of death by disease in the U.S. Diabetes also contributes to higher rates of morbidity-people with diabetes are at higher risk for heart disease, blindness, kidney failure, extremity amputations, and other chronic conditions. The objectives of this study were 1). to estimate the direct medical and indirect productivity-related costs attributable to diabetes and 2). to calculate and compare the total and per capita medical expenditures for people with and without diabetes. Research design and methods Medical expenditures were estimated for the U.S. population with and without diabetes in 2002 by sex, age, race/ethnicity, type of medical condition, and health care setting. Health care use and total health care expenditures attributable to diabetes were estimated using etiological fractions, calculated based on national health care survey data. The value of lost productivity attributable to diabetes was also estimated based on estimates of lost workdays, restricted activity days, prevalence of permanent disability, and mortality attributable to diabetes. RESULTS-Direct medical and indirect expenditures attributable to diabetes in 2002 were estimated at 132 billion US dollars. Direct medical expenditures alone totaled 91.8 billion US dollars and comprised 23.2 billion US dollars for diabetes care, 24.6 billion US dollars for chronic complications attributable to diabetes, and 44.1 billion US dollars for excess prevalence of general medical conditions. Inpatient days (43.9%), nursing home care (15.1%), and office visits (10.9%) constituted the major expenditure groups by service settings. In addition, 51.8% of direct medical expenditures were incurred by people >65 years old. Attributable indirect expenditures resulting from lost workdays, restricted activity days, mortality, and permanent disability due to diabetes totaled 39.8 billion US dollars. U.S. health expenditures for the health care components included in the study totaled 865 billion US dollars, of which 160 billion US dollars was incurred by people with diabetes. Per capita medical expenditures totaled 13243 US dollars for people with diabetes and 2560 US dollars for people without diabetes. When adjusting for differences in age, sex, and race/ethnicity between the population with and without diabetes, people with diabetes had medical expenditures that were approximately 2.4 times higher than expenditures that would be incurred by the same group in the absence of diabetes. Conclusions The estimated 132 billion US dollars cost likely underestimates the true burden of diabetes because it omits intangibles, such as pain and suffering, care provided by nonpaid caregivers, and several areas of health care spending where people with diabetes probably use services at higher rates than people without diabetes (e.g., dental care, optometry care, and the use of licensed dietitians). In addition, the cost estimate excludes undiagnosed cases of diabetes. Health care spending in 2002 for people with diabetes is more than double what spending would be without diabetes. Diabetes imposes a substantial cost burden to society and, in particular, to those individuals with diabetes and their families. Eliminating or reducing the health problems caused by diabetes through factors such as better access to preventive care, more widespread diagnosis, more intensive disease management, and the advent of new medical technologies could significantly improve the quality of life for people with diabetes and their families while at the same time potentially reducing national expenditures for health care services and increasing productivity in the U.S. economy.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040.

TL;DR: Diabetes prevalence, deaths attributable to diabetes, and health expenditure due to diabetes continue to rise across the globe with important social, financial and health system implications.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Ethnic Disparities in Diabetic Complications in an Insured Population

TL;DR: This study confirms previous reports of elevated incidence of ESRD among ethnic minorities, despite uniform medical care coverage, and provides new evidence that rates of other complications are similar or lower relative to those of whites.
Book

Prevention effectiveness : a guide to decision analysis and economic evaluation

TL;DR: Decision Analysis for Public Health: S.M. Teutsch and A.C. Shaffer and P.A. Haddix: Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health care expenditures for people with diabetes mellitus, 1992.

TL;DR: It is found that health care expenditures for people with diabetes constituted about one in seven health care dollars spent in 1992, and health care reform and insurers should take note of these findings and structure benefit packages to promote care likely to reduce the costs of caring for diabetics.
Journal Article

Oral agents in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

TL;DR: In patients for whom diet and exercise do not provide adequate glucose control, therapy with a single oral agent can be tried and a combination of agents with different mechanisms of action may have additive therapeutic effects and result in better glycemic control.
Journal Article

Therapy for diabetes

Related Papers (5)

Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)

R C Turner, +398 more
- 12 Sep 1998 -