scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Effectiveness of a Mental Health Court in Reducing Criminal Recidivism and Violence

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
It is shown that participation in the mental health court program was associated with longer time without any new criminal charges or new charges for violent crimes and maintenance of reductions in recidivism and violence after graduates were no longer under supervision of themental health court.
Abstract
Objective: In response to the large-scale involvement of people with mental disorders in the criminal justice system, many communities have created specialized mental health courts in recent years. However, little research has been done to evaluate the criminal justice outcomes of such courts. This study evaluated whether a mental health court can reduce the risk of recidivism and violence by people with mental disorders who have been arrested. Method: A retrospective observational design was used to compare the occurrence of new criminal charges for 170 people who entered a mental health court after arrest and 8,067 other adults with mental disorders who were booked into an urban county jail after arrest during the same interval. A matching strategy based on propensity scores was used to adjust analyses for nonrandom selection into mental health court. Results: Propensity-weighted Cox regression analysis, controlling for other potential confounding variables (demographic characteristics, clinical variables, and criminal history), showed that participation in the mental health court program was associated with longer time without any new criminal charges or new charges for violent crimes. Successful completion of the mental health court program was associated with maintenance of reductions in recidivism and violence after graduates were no longer under supervision of the mental health court. Conclusions: The results indicate that a mental health court can reduce recidivism and violence by people with mental disorders who are involved in the criminal justice system.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

“’Cause Everybody Likes to Be Treated Good”: Perceptions of Procedural Justice Among Mental Health Court Participants

TL;DR: There is mounting evidence that mental health courts (MHCs) reduce criminal recidivism and increase use of mental health services as mentioned in this paper, although not yet empirically tested, procedural justice has been p...
Journal ArticleDOI

Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis.

TL;DR: A meta-analytic investigation of the effect on criminal recidivism of adult MHC participation compared with traditional criminal processing suggested the need for research to identify additional sources of variability in the effectiveness of MHCs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Community-Based Alternatives for Justice-Involved Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: Review of the Relevant Research

TL;DR: The authors use the sequential intercept model as a guide and summarize the existing research at several points along the criminal justice continuum, highlighting the gaps in existing research and discussing the need for further research in several key areas.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stopping the revolving door: effectiveness of mental health court in reducing recidivism by mentally ill offenders.

TL;DR: The results suggest that an MHC can be effective in reducing recidivism among offenders with mental illness and also indicate that persons who commit more severe offenses may be appropriate candidates for MHC.
Journal ArticleDOI

A multi-site study of the use of sanctions and incentives in mental health courts.

TL;DR: Knowing which MHC participants are more likely to follow court orders and avoid sanctions, and identifying those who have difficulty adhering to court conditions, can help guide court officials on adjusting supervision, perhaps avoiding reoffending and program failure.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

Paul R. Rosenbaum, +1 more
- 01 Apr 1983 - 
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects under Exogeneity: A Review

TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the state of the art in estimating average treatment effects under various sets of assumptions, including exogeneity, unconfoundedness, or selection on observables.
Journal ArticleDOI

Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.

TL;DR: Propensity score weights estimated using boosting eliminate most pretreatment group differences and substantially alter the apparent relative effects of adolescent substance abuse treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimation of Causal Effects using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart Catheterization

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider methods for estimating causal effects of treatments when treatment assignment is unconfounded with outcomes conditional on a possibly large set of covariates, and apply these methods to data on the effects of right heart catheterization (RHC) studied in Connors et al.
Book

Rethinking Risk Assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence

TL;DR: Rethinking Risk Assessment as discussed by the authors is a pioneering investigation that challenges preconceptions about the frequency and nature of violence among persons with mental disorders, and suggests an innovative approach to predicting its occurrence.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How much is a court ordered mental health evaluation?

The results indicate that a mental health court can reduce recidivism and violence by people with mental disorders who are involved in the criminal justice system.