scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Effectiveness of Injectable Extended-Release Naltrexone vs Daily Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial.

TLDR
In this paper, a 12-week randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine whether treatment with extended-release naltrexone will be as effective as daily buprenorphine hydrochloride with naloxone Hydrochloride in maintaining abstinence from heroin and other illicit substances in newly detoxified individuals.
Abstract
Importance To date, extended-release naltrexone hydrochloride has not previously been compared directly with opioid medication treatment (OMT), currently the most commonly prescribed treatment for opioid dependence. Objective To determine whether treatment with extended-release naltrexone will be as effective as daily buprenorphine hydrochloride with naloxone hydrochloride in maintaining abstinence from heroin and other illicit substances in newly detoxified individuals. Design, Setting and Participants A 12-week, multicenter, outpatient, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 urban addiction clinics in Norway between November 1, 2012, and December 23, 2015; the last follow-up was performed on October 23, 2015. A total of 232 adult opioid-dependent (per DSM-IV criteria) individuals were recruited from outpatient addiction clinics and detoxification units and assessed for eligibility. Intention-to-treat analyses of efficacy end points were performed with all randomized participants. Interventions Randomization to either daily oral flexible dose buprenorphine-naloxone, 4 to 24 mg/d, or extended-release naltrexone hydrochloride, 380 mg, administered intramuscularly every fourth week for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary end points (protocol) were the randomized clinical trial completion rate, the proportion of opioid-negative urine drug tests, and number of days of use of heroin and other illicit opioids. Secondary end points included number of days of use of other illicit substances. Safety was assessed by adverse event reporting. Results Of 159 participants, mean (SD) age was 36 (8.6) years and 44 (27.7%) were women. Eighty individuals were randomized to extended-release naltrexone and 79 to buprenorphine-naloxone; 105 (66.0%) completed the trial. Retention in the extended-release naltrexone group was noninferior to the buprenorphine-naloxone group (difference, −0.1; with 95% CI, −0.2 to 0.1; P  = .04), with mean (SD) time of 69.3 (25.9) and 63.7 (29.9) days, correspondingly ( P  = .33, log-rank test). Treatment with extended-release naltrexone showed noninferiority to buprenorphine-naloxone on group proportion of total number of opioid-negative urine drug tests (mean [SD], 0.9 [0.3] and 0.8 [0.4], respectively, difference, 0.1 with 95% CI, −0.04 to 0.2; P P P Conclusions and Relevance Extended-release naltrexone was as effective as buprenorphine-naloxone in maintaining short-term abstinence from heroin and other illicit substances and should be considered as a treatment option for opioid-dependent individuals. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01717963

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevention and Treatment of Opioid Misuse and Addiction: A Review.

TL;DR: The factors that triggered the opioids crisis and its further evolution are analyzed, along with the interventions to manage and prevent opioid use disorder (OUD), which are fundamental for curtailing the opioid crisis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Management of opioid use disorder in the USA: present status and future directions.

TL;DR: There is an urgent need for expanding the use of medications for opioid use disorder, including training of health-care professionals in the treatment and prevention of opioid use Disorder, and for development of alternative medications and new models of care to expand capabilities for personalised interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Policy Pathways to Address Provider Workforce Barriers to Buprenorphine Treatment.

TL;DR: Policy pathways to addressing provider workforce barriers going forward include providing free and easy-to-access education for providers about opioid use disorders and medication- assisted treatment, eliminating buprenorphine waiver requirements for those licensed to prescribe controlled substances, enforcing insurance parity requirements, requiring coverage of evidence-based medication-assisted treatment as essential health benefits, and providing financial incentives for care coordination.
References
More filters
Journal Article

The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) : The development and validation of a Structured Diagnostic Psychiatric Interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10

TL;DR: The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview is designed to meet the need for a short but accurate structured psychiatric interview for multicenter clinical trials and epidemiology studies and to be used as a first step in outcome tracking in nonresearch clinical settings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research

TL;DR: The clinical validation of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) indicates that the ISI is a reliable and valid instrument to quantify perceived insomnia severity and is likely to be a clinically useful tool as a screening device or as an outcome measure in insomnia treatment research.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory

TL;DR: The historical evolution, development, rationale and validation of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist is described, a self-report symptom inventory comprised of 58 items which are representative of the symptom configurations commonly observed among outpatients.
Journal ArticleDOI

The fifth edition of the addiction severity index

TL;DR: The clinical and research uses of the ASI over the past 12 years are discussed, emphasizing some special circumstances that affect its administration.
Book ChapterDOI

Timeline Follow-Back A Technique for Assessing Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption

TL;DR: Concerns about how best to measure drinking patterns and problems date back to at least 1926, when Pearl stressed the importance of separating steady daily drinkers from occasional heavy drinkers.
Related Papers (5)