scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, a prospective, qualitative exploration of service user involvement within a study, where the aims of the evaluation were agreed beforehand, was described and reflective discussions about the process and progress of service users involvement at different stages of the study were recorded, transcribed and analysed.
Abstract
As service user involvement in health and social care research has become more firmly embedded in health policies, both in the UK and internationally, there is increasing interest in evaluating its potential benefits and outcomes. Impact studies have highlighted a range of different types of service user involvement, using diverse research methods, within various research topics and involving different stakeholders. Potential benefits to research, researchers and the service users actively involved in research have been identified, along with the possibility of some negative consequences. Many impact studies have been criticized for being based on informal retrospective accounts of researchers and service users working together. Few have been underpinned by conceptual models, and there is a paucity of detailed accounts of the process of involvement that would enable replication. This paper reports an account of a prospective, qualitative exploration of service user involvement within a study, where the aims of the evaluation were agreed beforehand. Reflective discussions about the process and progress of service user involvement at different stages of the study were recorded, transcribed and analysed. The qualitative analysis identified perceived benefits to research, researchers and service user researchers that endorsed previous findings. The analysis also highlighted subjective and interpersonal aspects of service user involvement that have seldom been reported. This evaluation demonstrates the benefits of allowing time for structured reflection and adds to the understanding of the process and meaning of service user involvement in research.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?

TL;DR: This work summarises the arguments in favour of coproduction, the different approaches to establishing coproductive work and their costs, and proposes some preliminary advice to help decide whenCoproduction is likely to be more or less useful.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice

TL;DR: This assessment provides explicit guidance for better alignment of engagement's promised benefits with evaluation efforts and identifies specific areas for development of evaluative measures and better reporting processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?

TL;DR: It is concluded that successful engagement in ‘evidence-based policymaking’ requires pragmatism, combining scientific evidence with governance principles, and persuasion to translate complex evidence into simple stories.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.

TL;DR: While this research suggests potential impact of stakeholder engagement, systematic characterization and evaluation of engagement at multiple stages of research is needed to build the evidence base.
Journal ArticleDOI

ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study

TL;DR: This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysing qualitative data

TL;DR: Qualitative research produces large amounts of textual data in the form of transcripts and observational fieldnotes, and the systematic and rigorous preparation and analysis of these data is time consuming and labour intensive.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consensus methods for medical and health services research.

TL;DR: Two consensus methods commonly adopted in medical, nursing, and health services research--the Delphi process and the nominal group technique (also known as the expert panel)--are described, together with the most appropriate situations for using them.
Journal ArticleDOI

Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement

TL;DR: This article summarises the final draft of the North American Primary Care Research Group's ploicy statement for participatory research, which was developed to help improve social and economic conditions, to effect change, and to reduce the distrust of the people being studied.
Journal ArticleDOI

Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach

TL;DR: The study finds barriers to consumers' ideas influencing research agendas can largely be overcome with good leadership, purposeful outreach to consumers, investing time and effort in good communication, training and support and thereby building good working relationships and building on experience.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lay perspectives: advantages for health research

TL;DR: In this article, the benefits and costs of incorporating lay input into health services research are discussed, and a framework is offered to help clarify the dimensions of lay involvement in health research.
Related Papers (5)