J
John Gabbay
Researcher at University of Southampton
Publications - 74
Citations - 4891
John Gabbay is an academic researcher from University of Southampton. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Evidence-based medicine. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 69 publications receiving 4647 citations. Previous affiliations of John Gabbay include Wessex Institute of Technology & University of Cambridge.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care
John Gabbay,Andrée le May +1 more
TL;DR: Clinicians rarely accessed and used explicit evidence from research or other sources directly, but relied on “mindlines”—collectively reinforced, internalised, tacit guidelines—to derive individual and collective healthcare decisions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach
Sandy Oliver,L Clarke-Jones,Rebecca Rees,Ruairidh Milne,Peter K. Buchanan,John Gabbay,Gill Gyte,Ann Oakley,Ken Stein +8 more
TL;DR: The study finds barriers to consumers' ideas influencing research agendas can largely be overcome with good leadership, purposeful outreach to consumers, investing time and effort in good communication, training and support and thereby building good working relationships and building on experience.
Journal ArticleDOI
No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based.
TL;DR: Underresearched questions concerning the latter stages of the creation, diffusion, and adoption of new knowledge, namely: What makes this information credible and therefore utilized?
Journal ArticleDOI
A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.
Sandy Oliver,Rebecca Rees,Lorna Clarke‐Jones,Ruairidh Milne,Ann Oakley,John Gabbay,Ken Stein,Phyll Buchanan,Gill Gyte +8 more
TL;DR: The development of a multidimensional conceptual framework capable of drawing out the implications for policy and practice of what is known about public involvement in research agenda setting is described.
Journal ArticleDOI
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research
Trisha Greenhalgh,Ellen Annandale,Richard Ashcroft,James Barlow,Nick Black,Alan Bleakley,Ruth Boaden,Jeffrey Braithwaite,Nicky Britten,Franco A. Carnevale,Katherine Checkland,Julianne Cheek,Alexander M. Clark,Simon Cohn,Jack Coulehan,Benjamin F. Crabtree,Steven Cummins,Frank Davidoff,Huw Davies,Robert Dingwall,Mary Dixon-Woods,Glyn Elwyn,Eivind Engebretsen,Ewan Ferlie,Naomi Fulop,John Gabbay,Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Dariusz Galasiński,Ruth Garside,Lucy Gilson,Peter Griffiths,Penny Hawe,Jan-Kees Helderman,Brian Hodges,David J. Hunter,David J. Hunter,Margaret H. Kearney,Celia Kitzinger,Jenny Kitzinger,Ayelet Kuper,Saville Kushner,Andrée le May,Lorelei Lingard,Louise Locock,Jill Maben,Mary Ellen Macdonald,Frances S. Mair,Russell Mannion,Martin Marshall,Carl May,Nicholas Mays,Lorna McKee,Marissa Miraldo,Marissa Miraldo,David G. Morgan,Janice M. Morse,Sarah Nettleton,Sandy Oliver,Warrren Pearce,Pierre Pluye,Catherine Pope,Glenn Robert,Celia Roberts,Stefania Rodella,Jo Rycroft-Malone,Margarete Sandelowski,Paul G. Shekelle,Fiona Stevenson,Sharon E. Straus,Deborah Swinglehurst,Sally Thorne,Göran Tomson,Gerd Westert,Sue Wilkinson,Brian Williams,Terry Young,Sue Ziebland +76 more
TL;DR: Seventy six senior academics from 11 countries invite The BMJ ’s editors to reconsider their policy of rejecting qualitative research on the grounds of low priority.