scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Evaluation of fasting and random plasma glucose for diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Fasting plasma glucose is a better investigation for the screening of gestational diabetes than plasma glucose post 50-g glucose challenge.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare different cut-off values of fasting and random plasma glucose as a screening test for diagnosis of gestational diabetes in comparison to the 50 grams Glucose Challenge Test (GCT). STUDY DESIGN Comparative, cross-sectional study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY This study was carried out between July 2006 to September 2007 at Departments of Pathology, Obstetrics/Gynaecology and Medicine, PNS Rahat Hospital, Karachi. METHODOLOGY A total of 53 pregnant subjects at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy were selected to undergo random and fasting blood sugar level estimation and 50-g GCT. All the subjects later underwent 100-g OGTT as well. The results were evaluated by both "Carpenter and Coustan criteria" and "NDDG criteria". The results of random plasma glucose random [cut-off: > or = 11.1 mmol/L], fasting plasma glucose (cut-off: > 5.3 mmol/L and > 5.1 mmol/L) and plasma glucose results post 50-g GCT (cut-off: > or =7.8 mmol/L and > or = 7.2 mmol/L) were evaluated against 100-g OGTT results through ROC curve analysis. Finally, various diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios (LR) and efficiency were evaluated. RESULTS Nineteen subjects were diagnosed to have GDM as per the "Carpenter and Coustan criteria" and 13 met the "NDDG criteria" as per the results of 100-g OGTT. Fasting plasma glucose at was the most efficient investigation at cutoff of 5.1 mmol/L sensitivity=66.66%, specificity=81.25%, PPV=70%, NPV=78.78%, LR+=3.56, LR-=0.41, efficiency=75.47%. At the cut-off value of 5.3 mmol/L, the results had 64% sensitivity, 85.71% specificity, 80% PPV, 72.72% NPV, 4.48 LR+, 0.42 LR-, 75.97% efficiency]. It was followed by plasma glucose post 50-g GCT (53.57% sensitivity at cut-off of > or = 7.2 mmol/L and 54.54% sensitivity at cut-off of > or = 7.8 mmol/L). CONCLUSION Fasting plasma glucose is a better investigation for the screening of gestational diabetes than plasma glucose post 50-g glucose challenge.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Fasting plasma glucose versus glucose challenge test: screening for gestational diabetes and cost effectiveness.

TL;DR: The GCT is better than the FPG in the population and is cost effective and the GCT yielded a better specificity than theFPG and the FCG for a comparable level of sensitivity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fasting capillary glucose as a screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus.

TL;DR: Fasting capillary glucose is used as a screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus compared with traditional risk factors and repeated randomCapillary glucose measurements are evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gestational diabetes in a high-risk population: using the fasting plasma glucose to simplify the diagnostic algorithm.

TL;DR: Though the high false positive rate at any FPG threshold with adequate sensitivity makes the FPG an inappropriate test for GDM screening, the FGP has the potential to avoid nearly one-third of the cumbersome OGTTs at the expense of missing one-fifth of pregnant women with milder GDM.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lack of Concordance between the 75-g and 100-g Glucose Load Tests for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

TL;DR: Among women with possible GDM in both early and late periods of pregnancy, there was only weak diagnostic agreement between results determined with 75-g and 100-g glucose loads.
Journal ArticleDOI

Which cutoff level should be used in screening for glucose intolerance in pregnancy

TL;DR: To prevent perinatal risks in pregnancies complicated by borderline glucose intolerance, with Carpenter-Coustan criteria a lower cutoff value could be hypothesized to improve test sensitivity, allowing more extensive diagnosis of "borderline" subjects.
Related Papers (5)