scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Evidence of psychological and biological effects of structured Mindfulness-Based Interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A meta-review.

TLDR
In this article, the authors conducted a meta-review, using a literature search from inception to June 2020 in several electronic databases using a combination of keywords including MBSR, MBCT, cancer, and meta-analysis OR "systematic review".
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A large number of studies have been conducted exploring the effects of mindfulness programs on health outcomes, such as psychological and biological outcomes. However, there is substantial heterogeneity among studies and, consequently, in the systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Since clinical practice is massively informed by evidence on review studies, our main objective was to summarize the reported evidence regarding the effects of structured mindfulness-based programs on psychological, biological, and quality-of-life outcomes in cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a meta-review, using a literature search from inception to June 2020 in several electronic databases using a combination of keywords including MBSR, MBCT, cancer, and meta-analysis OR "systematic review" (PROSPERO registration CRD42020186511). RESULTS Ten studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. The main findings were beneficial small to medium effect sizes of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)/Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)/Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) on psychological health, such as anxiety, depression, stress, and quality of life. A beneficial effect was found for biological outcomes, albeit based on a reduced number of studies. Studies were moderate homogenous regarding the intervention, population, and outcomes explored. Results on long-term follow-up seem to indicate that the effects tend not to be maintained, namely in shorter follow-ups (6 months). CONCLUSIONS This meta-review brings a broad perspective on the actual evidence regarding MBSR/MBCT/MBCR. We expect to contribute to future project design, focused on developing high-quality studies and exploring the moderating effects that might contribute to biased results, as well as exploring who might benefit more from MBSR/MBCT/MBCT interventions.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychosocial and Integrative Oncology: Interventions Across the Disease Trajectory.

TL;DR: An overview of the fields of psychosocial and integrative oncology is provided, highlighting common psychological reactions to being diagnosed with and treated for cancer, including distress, anxiety, depression, fear of cancer recurrence and caregiver burden, as well as symptoms of fatigue, pain, and sleep disturbance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of a 4-Week Internet-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery Intervention on the Symptom Burden and Quality of Life of Patients With Breast Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial

TL;DR: In this article , the authors investigated the effectiveness of a 4-week internet-delivered mindfulness-based cancer recovery (iMBCR) program in reducing symptom burden and enhancing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with breast cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

The modulatory role of internet-supported mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on extracellular vesicles and psychological distress in people who have had cancer: a protocol for a two-armed randomized controlled study

TL;DR: In this article , the effects of internet-supported mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) were investigated in a two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of an online mindfulness-based intervention on Fear of Cancer Recurrence and quality of life among Chinese breast cancer survivors.

TL;DR: Zhang et al. as mentioned in this paper assessed the feasibility and acceptability of an online mindfulness-based intervention and examined its effects on Chinese breast cancer survivors. But, the results of their study indicated that online MBI treatment could offer a scalable approach to manage FCR and maintain mental health for breast cancer patients.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

TL;DR: A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mindfulness Training as a Clinical Intervention: A Conceptual and Empirical Review

TL;DR: In this paper, a review summarizes conceptual approaches to mind-fulness and empirical research on the utility of mindfulness-based interventions, and suggests that these interventions may be helpful in the treatment of several disorders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

TL;DR: A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed that consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
Journal ArticleDOI

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

TL;DR: AMSTAR has good agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility, and these findings need confirmation by a broader range of assessors and a more diverse range of reviews.
Related Papers (5)