scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evolutionary substitutions and the antigenic structure of globular proteins.

TLDR
Additional evidence is summarized that the majority of evolutionary substitutions are immunologically detectable and how to reconcile this evidence with the chemical evidence that only a small fraction of the amino acids are antigenic is discussed.
Abstract
A FEW years ago, Crumpton1 and Reichlin2 reviewed information about the antigenic structure of globular proteins of known amino acid sequence and three-dimensional structure. It seemed that only a small fraction of the amino acid residues in such proteins participated directly in antibody binding. This impression was reinforced by Atassi and co-workers, who proposed antigenic structures of two such proteins—sperm whale myoglobin3 and chicken lysozyme c (ref.4). These workers claim to have identified all those amino acid residues which bind to antibodies present in antisera directed against the protein. These claims stem from extensive studies with chemically modified forms of the protein as well as with antigenically active fragments obtained by specific cleavage of the protein. The antigenic residues are arranged in groups called determinants, each of which binds a specific class of antibodies. A typical determinant contains four to seven residues. For both lysozyme and myoglobin, the proportion of antigenic residues is about 15% of the total number of amino acid residues in the protein3,4. Information has also accumulated concerning the power of antisera to detect evolutionary substitutions of amino acids in globular proteins. Quantitative immunological comparisons of related proteins of known amino acid sequence have consistently shown a strong correlation between degree of sequence difference and degree of antigenic difference. This has been demonstrated most thoroughly for monomeric globular proteins such as lysozymes5,6, ribonucleases7, azurins8 and cytochromes c (refs 9, 10). Less complete information suggests that the correlation holds also for plastocyanins10, tryptophan synthetase α subunits11, serum albumins12, carbonic anhydrases and myoglobins13 (A. B. Champion, E. M. Prager, S. L. Welch, and A. C. Wilson, unpublished), and ferredoxins14. From the strength of the correlations observed for lysozymes, ribonucleases, azurins and cytochromes (r > 0.9), one may make the statistical inference that about 80% (that is, 0.9 squared) of those amino acid substitutions which accumulate during evolution are immunologically detectable7. Here we summarise additional evidence that the majority of evolutionary substitutions are immunologically detectable, and we discuss how to reconcile this evidence with the chemical evidence that only a small fraction of the amino acids are antigenic.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Correlation between segmental mobility and the location of antigenic determinants in proteins

TL;DR: Most continuous antigenic determinants of tobacco mosaic virus protein, myoglobin and lysozyme correspond to those surface regions in the protein structure, as determined by X-ray crystallography, which possess a run of high-temperature factors along the polypeptide backbone, that is, a high segmental mobility.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Molecular Clock Hypothesis: Biochemical Evolution, Genetic Differentiation and Systematics

TL;DR: Should not be any clearcut borderline between the aims of various workers; the evolutionary geneticist studies organisms with a view to understanding the role and mechanisms of evolution, while the systematist is concerned with the evolution and interrelationships of particular animals or plants insofar as this information will enable him to place populations, species, or other taxa more accurately within an overall taxonomic scheme.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors in Protein Antigenic Structure

TL;DR: Which of these antibodies are made in any individual depends on factors extrinsic to the antigen molecule, host factors such as self-tolerance, immune response genes, idiotype networks, and the immunoglobulin structural gene repertoire.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three-dimensional structure of an antigen-antibody complex at 6 A resolution.

TL;DR: The structural basis of cross-reactivities of an antibody with heterologous antigens and the effect of a single amino acid substitution on antigenic specificity can be visualized in the structural model presented here.
Book ChapterDOI

Antibodies of predetermined specificity in biology and medicine.

TL;DR: The diversity and exquisite specificity of antibodies has captured the imagination of scientists since the time of Ehrlich but it turns out that even with monoclonal antibodies this is a difficult question to answer and one which can only be approached by an often complex protocol of biochemical or genetic experiments.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Experimental and theoretical aspects of protein folding.

TL;DR: The development of conformational energy calculation procedures will enable the three-dimensional structure of a native protein to be predicted from the knowledge of its amino acid sequence and its interactions with the solvent in which it is dissolved.
Journal ArticleDOI

Antigenic structure of myoglobin: the complete immunochemical anatomy of a protein and conclusions relating to antigenic structures of proteins.

TL;DR: Intensive research in the author's laboratory over an 11-yr period has now completed the first mapping out of all the antigenic reactive regions of a native protein.
Journal ArticleDOI

The dependence of immunological cross-reactivity upon sequence resemblance among lysozymes. I. Micro-complement fixation studies.

TL;DR: A correlation was observed between degree of immunological cross-reactivity and degree of amino acid sequence similarity, with the limitation that proteins differing from each other by 40% or more in sequence exhibited no cross- reactivity in micro-complement fixation tests.
Journal ArticleDOI

The dependence of immunological cross-reactivity upon sequence resemblance among lysozymes. II. Comparison of precipitin and micro-complement fixation results.

TL;DR: It seems to be a general rule that native proteins differing by more than 30 to 40% in sequence fail to cross-react in direct precipitin or complement fixation tests.
Related Papers (5)