scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Fluvial erosion/transport equation of landscape evolution models revisited

TLDR
In this paper, a mesoscale erosion/deposition model is presented, which couples the dynamics of streamflow and topography through a sediment transport length function x(q), which is the average travel distance of a particle in the flow before being trapped on topography.
Abstract
We present a mesoscale erosion/deposition model, which differs from previous landscape evolution models equations by taking explicitly into account a mass balance equation for the streamflow. The geological and hydrological complexity is lumped into two basic fluxes (erosion and deposition) and two averaged parameters (unit width discharge q and stream slope s). The model couples the dynamics of streamflow and topography through a sediment transport length function x(q), which is the average travel distance of a particle in the flow before being trapped on topography. This property reflects a time lag between erosion and deposition, which allows the streamflow not to be instantaneously at capacity. The so-called x-q model may reduce either to transport-limited or to detachment-limited erosion modes depending on x. But it also may not. We show in particular how it does or does not for steady state topographies, long-term evolution, and high-frequency base level perturbations. Apart from the unit width discharge and the settling velocity, the x(q) function depends on a dimensionless number encompassing the way sediment is transported within the streamflow. Using models of concentration profile through the water column, we show the dependency of this dimensionless coefficient on the Rouse number. We discuss how consistent the x-q model framework is with bed load scaling expressions and Einstein's conception of sediment motion.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Modelling landscape evolution

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of landscape theory in the form of numerical models of drainage basin evolution and the current knowledge gaps and future computing challenges that exist, as well as a review of the current state of the art.
Journal ArticleDOI

The stream power river incision model: evidence, theory and beyond

TL;DR: All published incising river datasets away from knickpoints or knickzones are in a regime dominated by threshold effects requiring an explicit upscaling of flood stochasticity neglected in the standard SPIM and other incision models, shown here to have a narrow range of validity.
Journal ArticleDOI

A very efficient O(n), implicit and parallel method to solve the stream power equation governing fluvial incision and landscape evolution

TL;DR: A new algorithm to solve the basic stream power equation, which governs channel incision and landscape evolution in many geomorphic settings, is presented, which is highly efficient and unconditionally stable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physics‐based modeling of large braided sand‐bed rivers: Bar pattern formation, dynamics, and sensitivity

TL;DR: In this paper, a physics-based morphological model for sand-bed braided rivers has been proposed to reproduce morphology and dynamics characteristic of braided river and determine the model sensitivity to generally used constitutive relations for flow and sediment transport.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advances in understanding river-groundwater interactions

TL;DR: A review of state-of-the-art approaches in characterizing and modeling river and groundwater interactions is presented in this paper, which covers a wide range of approaches, including remote sensing to characterize the streambed, emerging methods to measure exchange fluxes between rivers and groundwater, and developments in several disciplines relevant to the river-groundwater interface.
References
More filters
Book

The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications

TL;DR: In this paper, the hydraulic characteristics of stream channels are measured quantitatively and vary with discharge as simple power functions at a given river cross section, and similar variations in relation to discharge exist among the cross sections along the length of a river under the condition that discharge at all points is equal in frequency of occurrence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamics of the stream‐power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the stream power erosion model in an effort to elucidate its consequences in terms of large-scale topographic (fluvial) relief and its sensitivity to tectonic and climatic forcing.

The Bed-Load Function for Sediment Transportation in Open Channel Flows

Abstract: CONTENTS Page Introduction. 1 Approach to the problem. _ 3 Limitation of the bed-load function _ _ _ 4 The undetermined function 4 The alluvial stream. 5 The sediment mixture 6 Hydraulics of the alluvial channel. 7 The friction formula 7 The friction factor 8 Resistance of the bars 9 The laminar sublayer 10 The transition between hydraulically rough and smooth beds_ 12 The velocity fluctuations 13 Suspension 14 The transportation rate of suspended load 17 Integration of the suspended load. _ 17 Numerical integration of suspended load 19 Limit of suspension. 24 The bed layer 24 Practical calculation of suspended load___ ____ 25 Numerical example 26 Page Bed-load concept 29 Some constants entering the laws of bed-load motion: 31 The bed-load equation 32 The exchange time 33 The exchange probability 34 Determination of the probability V 35 Transition between bed load and. suspended load 38 The necessary graphs 40 Flume tests with sediment mixtures.. 42 Sample calculation of a river reachl 44 Choice of a river reach 45 Description of a river reach_____ 45 Application of procedure to Big Sand Creek, Miss 46 Discussion of calculations 60 Limitations of the method____ 65 Summary. 67 Literature cited 68 Appendix 69 List of symbols. 69 Work charts _ 71
Related Papers (5)