scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

High incidence and prevalence of visual problems after acute stroke: An epidemiology study with implications for service delivery.

TLDR
Incidence and point prevalence of visual problems in acute stroke is alarmingly high, affecting over half the survivors, and crucial information can be provided on visual status and its functional significance to the stroke team, patients and carers, enabling early intervention.
Abstract
Background Visual problems are an under-reported sequela following stroke. The aim of this study is to report annual incidence and point prevalence of visual problems in an acute adult stroke population and to explore feasibility of early timing of visual assessment. Methods and findings Multi-centre acute stroke unit, prospective, epidemiology study (1st July 2014 to 30th June 2015). Orthoptists reviewed all patients with assessment of visual acuity, visual fields, ocular alignment, ocular motility, visual inattention and visual perception. 1033 patients underwent visual screening at a median of 3 days (IQR 2) and full visual assessment at a median of 4 days (IQR 7) after the incident stroke: 52% men, 48% women, mean age 73 years and 87% ischaemic strokes. Excluding pre-existent eye problems, the incidence of new onset visual sequelae was 48% for all stroke admissions and 60% in stroke survivors. Three quarters 752/1033 (73%) had visual problems (point prevalence): 56% with impaired central vision, 40% eye movement abnormalities, 28% visual field loss, 27% visual inattention, 5% visual perceptual disorders. 281/1033 (27%) had normal eye exams. Conclusions Incidence and point prevalence of visual problems in acute stroke is alarmingly high, affecting over half the survivors. For most, visual screening and full visual assessment was achieved within about 5 days of stroke onset. Crucial information can thus be provided on visual status and its functional significance to the stroke team, patients and carers, enabling early intervention.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

“Invisible” visual impairments. A qualitative study of stroke survivors` experience of vision symptoms, health services and impact of visual impairments

TL;DR: Increased competence and standardized evidence-based clinical pathways for VIs are suggested to advance all stroke health services including rehabilitation in order to improve outcomes and adaptation to future life for stroke survivors with VIs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Trends in prevalence of acute stroke impairments: A population-based cohort study using the South London Stroke Register.

TL;DR: It is found that stroke patients in the SLSR had a complexity of acute impairments, of which limb motor deficit, dysphagia, and incontinence have declined since 2001, with women and the older population, in particular, seeing fewer reductions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians on virtual reality as a precursor to using telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke

TL;DR: End-user perspectives on the use of self-administered VR for spatial neglect in a university environment were explored to identify barriers and facilitators prior to extending its use remotely as a telerehabilitation tool.
Journal ArticleDOI

Vision Screening Assessment (VISA) tool: diagnostic accuracy validation of a novel screening tool in detecting visual impairment among stroke survivors.

TL;DR: This validation study indicates acceptability of VISA for screening of potential visual impairment in stroke survivors, and Sensitivity and specificity were high indicating the accuracy of this screening tool.
Journal ArticleDOI

Macular Microvasculature Is Associated With Total Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Burden in Recent Single Subcortical Infarction

TL;DR: It is suggested that retinal and choroidal imaging may serve as useful indicators to expand the understanding of RSSI and its clinical validity.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies

TL;DR: The STROBE Statement is a checklist of items that should be addressed in articles reporting on the 3 main study designs of analytical epidemiology: cohort, casecontrol, and cross-sectional studies; these recommendations are not prescriptions for designing or conducting studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

TL;DR: In this article, a group of methodologists, researchers, and journal editors sets out guidelines to improve reports of observational studies, which hampers assessment and makes it less useful.
Related Papers (5)