scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Determine feasibility of shared decision‐making programmes in fee‐for‐service hospital systems including physicians’ offices and in‐patient facilities.
Abstract
Objective Determine feasibility of shared decision-making programmes in fee-for-service hospital systems including physicians’ offices and in-patient facilities. Design Survey and participant observation. Data obtained during Phase 1 of a patient outcome study. Settings and participants Three hospitals in Michigan: one 299-bed rural regional hospital, one 650-bed urban community hospital, one 459-bed urban and suburban teaching hospital. All nurses and physicians who agreed to use the programmes participated in the evaluation (n = 34). Intervention Two shared decision-making® (SDP) multimedia programmes: surgical treatment choice for breast cancer and ischaemic heart disease treatment choice. Main outcome measures (1) clinicians’ evaluations of programme quality; (2) challenges in hospital settings; and (3) patient referral rates. Results SDP programmes were judged to be clear, accurate and about the right length and amount of information. Programmes were judged to be informative and appropriate for patients to see before making a decision. Clinicians were neutral about patients’ desire to participate in treatment decision-making. Referral volume to SDPs was lower than expected: 24 patients in 7 months across three hospitals. Implementation challenges centred on time pressures in patient care. Conclusions Productivity and time pressure in US health care severely constrain shared decision-making programme implementation. Physician referral may not be a reliable mechanism for patient access. Possible innovations include: (1) incorporation into the informed consent process; (2) provider or payer negotiated requirement in the routine hospital procedure to use the SDP as a quality indicator; and (3) payer reimbursement to professional providers who make SDP programmes available to patients.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters

TL;DR: A focused and systematic review of articles that specifically address SDM reveals that there is no shared definition ofSDM and proposes a definition that integrates the extant literature base and outlines essential elements that must be present for patients and providers to engage in the process of SDM.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions

TL;DR: This systematic review update confirms the results of the original review on the barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice as perceived by health professionals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making

TL;DR: The results support the view that many patients currently can't participate in SDM, rather than they won't participate because they do not want to, and future implementation efforts should address patient-reported factors together with known clinician-reported barriers and the wider organizational context.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementing shared decision making in the NHS

TL;DR: Creation of a platform of tools to provide information to doctors and patients should be the first step in giving patients choice about their treatment, say Glyn Elwyn and colleagues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions

TL;DR: It is revealed that interventions to foster implementation of shared decision-making in clinical practice will need to address a broad range of factors, and that on this subject there is very little known about any health professionals others than physicians.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship

TL;DR: Four models of the doctor-patient interaction are outlined, emphasizing the different understandings of the goals of the physicianpatient interaction, the physician's obligations, the role of patient values, and the conception of patient autonomy, which constitute Weberian ideal types.
Journal ArticleDOI

Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review

TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic review of randomised trials of patient decision aids in improving decision making and outcomes was conducted, which included randomized trials of interventions providing structured, detailed, and specific information on treatment or screening options and outcomes to aid decision making.
Journal ArticleDOI

Paternalism or partnership?: Patients have grown up—and there's no going back

Angela Coulter
- 18 Sep 1999 - 
TL;DR: The articles assembled in this issue of the BMJ consider the scope for creating meaningful partnerships between doctors and patients and between health policymakers and local communities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization.

TL;DR: A network of microcomputer workstations for writing all inpatient orders significantly lowered patient charges and hospital costs, which would amount to savings of more than $3 million in charges annually for this hospital's medicine service and potentially tens of billions of dollars nationwide.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice

TL;DR: The prospects for harnessing evidence to improve health care and the problems that readers—clinicians, planners, and patients—will need to overcome to enjoy the benefits of research are discussed.
Related Papers (5)